• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Decisions, decisions

CarltonTheBear said:
I wonder what happens with Peter Holland. For the most part I've always liked him as a cheap bottom-6er but I keep forgetting that he exists when it comes to next season.

I keep forgetting Matt Hunwick exists.
 
Potvin29 said:
CarltonTheBear said:
I wonder what happens with Peter Holland. For the most part I've always liked him as a cheap bottom-6er but I keep forgetting that he exists when it comes to next season.

I keep forgetting Matt Hunwick exists.

I don't, but that's only because I wake up every day terrified Babcock will keep playing him with Rielly.
 
Coco-puffs said:
Love the banner.  And I completely agree, he's the priority out of the RFA's.

I was down on him for a lot of the season due to him leading the team in being burned on glaring giveaways, but the way he closed out the season, I'd put Marincin right up there on the priority list as well. Maybe for even a cap friendly long term gamble.

Regarding Holland, he's a bit of a frustration. He's shows remarkable skill at times, but consistency is lacking. If they move JVR, perhaps he gets a longer opportunity, but you have to figure it's getting to a fish or cut bait scenario.
 
McGarnagle said:
Coco-puffs said:
Love the banner.  And I completely agree, he's the priority out of the RFA's.

I was down on him for a lot of the season due to him leading the team in being burned on glaring giveaways, but the way he closed out the season, I'd put Marincin right up there on the priority list as well. Maybe for even a cap friendly long term gamble.

Regarding Holland, he's a bit of a frustration. He's shows remarkable skill at times, but consistency is lacking. If they move JVR, perhaps he gets a longer opportunity, but you have to figure it's getting to a fish or cut bait scenario.

Holland's days are numbered if he doesn't show up early next season and remain consistent.  He can no longer float and expect to stay with our Leafs.

I'm sure Babcock will make him aware that he has to bring it every game or he can expect to be dumped for a 2nd or 3rd round pick.
 
Holland's days make me think of Eggs Benedict.

In other news:
http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/p-a-parenteau-unrestricted-free-agent-toronto-maple-leafs-discussions-mike-babcock-loved/

So despite an unsuccessful effort to trade the 33-year-old forward at the deadline, Toronto is at least open to bringing Parenteau back next season.

"There have been a couple of discussions. Very preliminary. I would say every possibility is on the table," Partenteau's agent, Allan Walsh, told Sportsnet. "They have not closed the door to him coming back, but I don't think it's a decision that's going to be made now. I think it's a decision that's going to be made just before we get to July 1."

Refresher on forward depth at the moment, not including waiver exempt Marlies and contracts expiring to UFA this season.
+ is likely LTIR, italics is UFA next season, * is RFA pending offer
Left WingCentreRight Wing
JvRKadriKomarov
MichalekBozakLupul +?
GreeningHolland *Horton +
LaichFroese
Leivo *S. Carrick *
C. Smith *

Of course, this list does not include Nylander, Marner, and the 2016 first overall pick. We are at 13 live bodies before adding those three, and dreadfully sparse on the right side, with Komarov already playing his off wing. If Lupul is actually active next season, he struggles on the RW anyway.

Fortunately, we are a few weeks away from the draft and free agency starting up, which should churn the roster a bit and clear up the picture somewhat.

Internal RW options are (very) good: Nylander, Marner, Brown, Soshnikov, Kapanen
Bozak can shift to RW too and looked pretty good alongside Kadri for brief stretches, as can Colin Smith and Byron Froese at the bottom of the line up.
 
Nik the Trik said:
I liked PAP but I can't for the life of me figure out why you'd bring him back.

Yeah if at minimum two of Michalek/Laich/Greening/Lupul disappeared then I'd consider it. But as things stand there's no way.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Nik the Trik said:
I liked PAP but I can't for the life of me figure out why you'd bring him back.

Yeah if at minimum two of Michalek/Laich/Greening/Lupul disappeared then I'd consider it. But as things stand there's no way.

I wouldn't want to sign him either. Could be that they want to insulate the right side a bit seeing how thin it is on the depth chart, and make PAP the new Winnik, but I've always preferred to roll the youth this upcoming season and take those lumps as they come. Would be kind of neat to dedicate the RW entirely to the rookies where applicable, other than Komarov on the Kadri shutdown line.

JvR - Kadri - Komarov
Michalek/Hyman - Nylander - Brown
Greening/Holland - Matthews - Marner
Laich/Leivo - Bozak/S. Carrick/C. Smith - Soshnikov

I'm expecting some of the names on the left side to be moved. The UFA trio might not get moved until the deadline, and they seem like good solid veterans to learn from. JvR and any of the pending RFAs are draft day bait in my opinion.
 
herman said:
I wouldn't want to sign him either. Could be that they want to insulate the right side a bit seeing how thin it is on the depth chart, and make PAP the new Winnik, but I've always preferred to roll the youth this upcoming season and take those lumps as they come. Would be kind of neat to dedicate the RW entirely to the rookies where applicable, other than Komarov on the Kadri shutdown line.

I think though that knowing Babcock he's probably not going to want to have any lines that are entirely composed of rookies. So I doubt you see JVR-Kadri-Komarov. I think it might be pretty likely that what we see is a pretty set group of LW-C combinations and then you rotate the RW's through depending on what you find that works and wanting to not have a line like Hyman-Nylander-Brown where everyone's a kid.
 
herman said:
JvR - Kadri - Komarov
Michalek/Hyman - Nylander - Brown
Greening/Holland - Matthews - Marner
Laich/Leivo - Bozak/S. Carrick/C. Smith - Soshnikov

Sosh played on the left side with the Leafs, so assuming that's something that will carry over I could see:

JVR-Matthews-PAP
Soshnikov-Kadri-Komarov
Hyman-Nylander-Brown
Laich-Bozak/Holland-Marner

That leaves you with a lot of veteran presence in the top-6, and one kid line that would get very favourable minutes. And it's probably important to note that those 3 kids on that line aren't exactly coming straight from junior.

One of Bozak or Holland would have to go. 2 of Greening/Michalek/Lupul would have to disappear with the other being used as the 13th forward.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
herman said:
JvR - Kadri - Komarov
Michalek/Hyman - Nylander - Brown
Greening/Holland - Matthews - Marner
Laich/Leivo - Bozak/S. Carrick/C. Smith - Soshnikov

Sosh played on the left side with the Leafs, so assuming that's something that will carry over I could see:

JVR-Matthews-PAP
Soshnikov-Kadri-Komarov
Hyman-Nylander-Brown
Laich-Bozak/Holland-Marner

That leaves you with a lot of veteran presence in the top-6, and one kid line that would get very favourable minutes. And it's probably important to note that those 3 kids on that line aren't exactly coming straight from junior.

One of Bozak or Holland would have to go. 2 of Greening/Michalek/Lupul would have to disappear with the other being used as the 13th forward.

Although, wasn't McDavid even insulated from the top line during his rookie season, aside from the occasional look?

This is how the Oilers' season ended.

http://www2.dailyfaceoff.com/teams/lines/24/edmonton-oilers

McDavid on 2nd line with Maroon and Eberle.
 
TBLeafer said:
Although, wasn't McDavid even insulated from the top line during his rookie season, aside from the occasional look?

This is how the Oilers' season ended.

http://www2.dailyfaceoff.com/teams/lines/24/edmonton-oilers

McDavid on 2nd line with Maroon and Eberle.

The Oilers didn't like the McDavid-Hall combo for whatever reason, so they rarely played together. For that reason it's probably difficult to say which of those lines was truly the top line. But McDavid did finish the season 3rd in average ice-time among forward at 18:53. Hall (19:12) and RNH (19:03) were only barely ahead of him.
 
TBLeafer said:
CarltonTheBear said:
herman said:
JvR - Kadri - Komarov
Michalek/Hyman - Nylander - Brown
Greening/Holland - Matthews - Marner
Laich/Leivo - Bozak/S. Carrick/C. Smith - Soshnikov

Sosh played on the left side with the Leafs, so assuming that's something that will carry over I could see:

JVR-Matthews-PAP
Soshnikov-Kadri-Komarov
Hyman-Nylander-Brown
Laich-Bozak/Holland-Marner

That leaves you with a lot of veteran presence in the top-6, and one kid line that would get very favourable minutes. And it's probably important to note that those 3 kids on that line aren't exactly coming straight from junior.

One of Bozak or Holland would have to go. 2 of Greening/Michalek/Lupul would have to disappear with the other being used as the 13th forward.

Although, wasn't McDavid even insulated from the top line during his rookie season, aside from the occasional look?

This is how the Oilers' season ended.

http://www2.dailyfaceoff.com/teams/lines/24/edmonton-oilers

McDavid on 2nd line with Maroon and Eberle.

Aside from Nurse, that's some weak d they have in Edmonton.
 
TBLeafer said:
Although, wasn't McDavid even insulated from the top line during his rookie season, aside from the occasional look?

Among all C's on Edmonton McDavid was #1 in terms of 5 on 5 + PP ice time per game and #1 on the entire team in  PP TOI per game. In that last game of the season he got 21:45 of ice time to just over 16 minutes for RNH.

So it's pretty clear he was the #1 guy.
 
Nik the Trik said:
TBLeafer said:
Although, wasn't McDavid even insulated from the top line during his rookie season, aside from the occasional look?

Among all C's on Edmonton McDavid was #1 in terms of 5 on 5 + PP ice time per game and #1 on the entire team in  PP TOI per game. In that last game of the season he got 21:45 of ice time to just over 16 minutes for RNH.

So it's pretty clear he was the #1 guy.

As CTB posted, over the course of the season, he was #2 behind RNH for ATOI.  Sample size matters.
 
TBLeafer said:
As CTB posted, over the course of the season, he was #2 behind RNH for ATOI.  Sample size matters.

That's only if you include SH ice time. Typically who the #1 line is doesn't have much to do with penalty killing situations.

Obviously because they both missed so much of last year using ATOI is tricky because RNH's ice time was likely to be higher when McDavid was hurt and vice-versa so their ice time in a lot of games isn't really a reflection of a coach choosing one or the other but just who was healthy.

For the last 9 games of the season where they were both in the line-up, McDavid had more ice-time than RNH in every game having 8 games where he had 20+ minutes to RNH having 0.
 
btw the reason I use the last 9 games above as opposed to a larger, more significant number is just because of how much the two guys were hurt and how little their seasons overlapped. Prior to March 12th the last game the two were both in the line-up(and the last game with the two of them where RNH had more ice-time) was October 31st.
 
Nik the Trik said:
TBLeafer said:
As CTB posted, over the course of the season, he was #2 behind RNH for ATOI.  Sample size matters.

That's only if you include SH ice time. Typically who the #1 line is doesn't have much to do with penalty killing situations.

Obviously because they both missed so much of last year using ATOI is tricky because RNH's ice time was likely to be higher when McDavid was hurt and vice-versa so their ice time in a lot of games isn't really a reflection of a coach choosing one or the other but just who was healthy.

For the last 9 games of the season where they were both in the line-up, McDavid had more ice-time than RNH in every game having 8 games where he had 20+ minutes to RNH having 0.

Okay, so admittedly having only looked at where he was listed at season's end and not going as far as into finding TOI over the last nine games, McDavid did see some sheltered ice to start his rookie season up until (or near) the end of it.  We all knew where he was headed, but he certainly didn't start there is my point.
 
TBLeafer said:
As CTB posted, over the course of the season, he was #2 behind RNH for ATOI.  Sample size matters.

I did note that there was only a 10-second gap there though, so they were basically even using ATOI.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top