Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stebro said:That's a steal for Carolina, I don't really want to give crap to a new leaf, but Gardiner at that contract or Ceci? Definately Gardiner.
OldTimeHockey said:Stebro said:That's a steal for Carolina, I don't really want to give crap to a new leaf, but Gardiner at that contract or Ceci? Definately Gardiner.
But, without taking on Ceci, the Leafs still have Zaitsev eating the same 4 million dollars....for longer.
Highlander said:Signed a 4 year 16 mill deal, always liked him, and glad he now has real financial security. 8)
moon111 said:Gardiner has 30 giveaways in 19 playoff games.
herman said:Slice and dice it however you?d like, but Gardiner and Ceci do not occupy the same niche.
Gardiner ?> Muzzin
Zaitsev ?> Ceci
Hainsey ?> Barrie
Nik the Trik said:herman said:Slice and dice it however you?d like, but Gardiner and Ceci do not occupy the same niche.
Gardiner ?> Muzzin
Zaitsev ?> Ceci
Hainsey ?> Barrie
Can I slice it and dice it to the point where I think the idea that defensmen have to fill a particular niche is dumb?
Nik the Trik said:Except I think the idea is you make the Zaitsev trade and then walk away from Ceci's arbitration award.
Deebo said:He had a 4.3M QO that expired on July 15th, if the Leafs didn't sign him by then, I would assume he would just accepted the QO because he would have known that there was a good chance that the Leafs would walk away from an arbitration award and he wouldn't be able to get 4M+ on the UFA market.
herman said:In cap restricted roster building, where you can?t just buy flawless players? Even without the cap, there?s still a TOI limitation that means the bottom chunk of the roster is populated by players with maybe a standout skill that?s leveraged through usage.
Deebo said:I can't explain the 200k extra, but I don't think there was any way to just walk away from Ceci all together.
Frank E said:I think the Leafs' threat of walking away from any arbitration would be enough to hold him to his already overpriced QO.
I'm not sure Dubas is getting enough criticism for this extra $200K, given how tight they are up against the cap this season. $4.3m was already too much, and nobody would have blamed the Leafs if they just cut-bait and let him go to UFA, if indeed Ceci wanted to roll the dice and elect for arbitration.
Nik the Trik said:Frank E said:I think the Leafs' threat of walking away from any arbitration would be enough to hold him to his already overpriced QO.
I'm not sure Dubas is getting enough criticism for this extra $200K, given how tight they are up against the cap this season. $4.3m was already too much, and nobody would have blamed the Leafs if they just cut-bait and let him go to UFA, if indeed Ceci wanted to roll the dice and elect for arbitration.
I think the problem with this line of thought is that it assumes the Leafs don't really want Ceci and just have him because Ottawa forced him on them. Because in that case, sure, you're fine with starting things off with threats and a willingness to walk away.
If, however, you genuinely think he's going to be your #4 defenseman because you think he fits an appropriate niche and holds his stick in the right hand then 200k is a small price to pay for making him happy that he's not stuck with his QO and comes into camp eager to make an impression.