Andy said:
15 million per for Bautista on a short term deal really doesn't have much downside either.
I suppose it depends on what you mean by downside. I agree that it's not a deal that would bury the Jays or anything but I'd have a number of concerns.
1. I wouldn't be too sure about Bautista's defense vs. Saunders'. Bautista was graded at a -1.4 by BR last year and Saunders was a -1.7. Admittedly that's the difference between Saunders in Left and Bautista in right where the baseline figures to be a little higher but add on another year of age to Bautista and it might be pretty close.
2. To that end you have to wonder how much Bautista's bat can come back. If it can then, sure, he's valuable in Left despite the defense. If not, you could very well have a situation where he's effectively the same as Saunders last year.
3. I'd wonder the extent to which Bautista could then handle, ego-wise, being in a reduced role.
4. Likewise, you have to at least wonder about the wisdom of continuing to just stack the lineup with righthanded power bats. I think the last two LCS' showed us how that can backfire.
5. To that end, you have to wonder if that 15 million couldn't be more effectively spent elsewhere given the Jays' limited budget.
This is where I'm a little puzzled, I suppose, by the Morales deal. I get that he's a switch hitter but it seems like if Bautista was available and could slide into the DH role that might be the higher upside move.