• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Kyle Dubas is JFJ 2.0 - Discuss

Significantly Insignificant said:
The defence rested on Justin Pogge.

The way I remember it the defense of the deal had less to do with Rask vs. Pogge and more about people genuinely(or optimistically) thinking Raycroft would be a good #1 goalie for some time.
 
Hobbes said:
Hindsight is also 20:20

I really don't want to relitigate the freaking Andrew Raycroft trade but nah. It sucked at the time. People said so.

Hobbes said:
And then adding to all of that was MLSE (under the teacher's pension plan ownership at the time) didn't have the stomach for a rebuild and wanted JFJ to "win now" so they were more or less forcing him to swing for the fences.

Now this I do agree with. It's not some sort of crazy coincidence that our opinions of Leafs GMs flipped as soon as they were allowed to pursue a real rebuild. JFJ and Burke and Nonis made bad decisions but so did Lamoriello and Dubas will too I'm sure. The difference is that JFJ, Burke and Nonis were trying to accomplish a ridiculous, impossible and MLSE mandated job.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
I know, just saying he hasn't proven anything yet when it counts the most.

I get that the whole "Nothing else matters in sports but winning when the chips are down" machismo nonsense is an easy sell to meatheads on Fox sports but it's really not true when it comes to what a GM does. Dubas isn't actually responsible for whether or not a team wins a game 7. His job is just to put them in a decent position to do so.

Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
So, do you have any criticisms of him?  Surely you must.

He's literally been GM for one year. A year that started with him making maybe the biggest UFA signing in NHL history. The idea that I "must" have meaningful and substantial criticisms of him in his job seems a little soft.

There's nowhere near enough track record to have a real beef with the job he's done.

For the benefit of others, I've edited Nik's response to get rid of his usual extraneous strawmen exaggerations that cause the discussion to break down.  Going forward, you'll have to do this for yourselves, of course.
 
Can someone please point me to the NHL GM that has had nothing but home runs and universally lauded deals?

And Brian Burke nominating himself doesn?t count.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Bender said:
JFJ trading Rask for Raycroft was indefensible

Believe me, as a veteran of these boards, I very much wish that had been the case.

It?s true. I remember there was a split on that trade. Some we?re calling it trading an unknown for a known. And there was speculation that they thought pogge was the real deal. This is actually very painful to talk about. Honest to god worst trade in franchise history. Dude is still f?n playing... has made it to the finals twice as a starter. Just... I just can?t.
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
For the benefit of others, I've edited Nik's response to get rid of his usual extraneous strawmen exaggerations that cause the discussion to break down.

You literally said that I "must" have criticisms of Dubas. Word for word.
 
Bullfrog said:
Why would any person care about MLSE paying Zaitsev's signing bonus?

And yes, that's what I'm pulling out of that post. Others can take care of the other parts.  :P
Only because the whole reason for getting rid of Zaitsev was his contract - yes, Zaitsev wanted out but frankly that's his problem -- and paying $3M undermines that purpose.
 
KW Sluggo said:
herman said:
JVR, Bozak, Marleau were all Lamoriello decisions. So should this thread not be re-titled?

No because getting rid of them for absolutely nothing were not Lou's decisions.

Lou was the GM for Bozak/JVR's last season. Unless you're upset Dubas didn't trade their rights after the season finished.
 
louisstamos said:
The short answer is no.  Dubas is 1 year into the job.

He's basically made 2 trades - Muzzin for a 1st+ which was a good move, and a 1st to get out of the Marleau contract, which was rough but necessary to make room for Kap/Mango/Marner.

JFJ traded Rask for Raycroft, and a 1st for Toskala.

They're not even in the same stratosphere at the moment.

At the moment, but give it time, Dubas is just starting out.

That said, he has already dealt away two first rounders, one of which went as a "sweetener".

 
KW Sluggo said:
louisstamos said:
The short answer is no.  Dubas is 1 year into the job.

He's basically made 2 trades - Muzzin for a 1st+ which was a good move, and a 1st to get out of the Marleau contract, which was rough but necessary to make room for Kap/Mango/Marner.

JFJ traded Rask for Raycroft, and a 1st for Toskala.

They're not even in the same stratosphere at the moment.

At the moment, but give it time, Dubas is just starting out.

That said, he has already dealt away two first rounders, one of which went as a "sweetener".
Tough pill to swallow but let's not blame the GM who, you know, signed those insane contracts in the first place.
 
Nik the Trik said:
KW Sluggo said:
A smarter strategy would have been to peg the Tavares contract as the the maximum contract with other players having to line up under that amount. Dubas did not do so with Matthews, he overpaid Nylander and now faces the same problem with Marner.

This, of course, is true. It would have been much smarter if Dubas had gone with the very very smart and well considered strategy of...paying players less than they want.

I guess you forgot that Lou did exactly that with Brodeur being the top contract in NJ and the Bruins did it with Bourque contract.  I guess you think they are the amateurs.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top