Kin
New member
Bates said:If they aren't most important why do their contracts matter so much?
Because, again, negotiating those deals was on Dubas' plate this off-season and regardless of what happened with Tavares that was always going to be true. You might have noticed that in the whole 25 page thread called "Contracts for the Big 3" that you posted in multiple
times.
Bates said:Why not include Gardiner in must do contracts then?
Because most people are assuming that the Leafs aren't likely to be able to negotiate an extension with Gardiner at a fair market value with UFA status looming. It's why, for instance, the Nylander negotiations have been almost constant daily news and nobody is reporting on any Gardiner negotiations.
But also, back to 8th grade level comprehension of the language, saying that the Leafs have three big extensions to work on does not mean they did not have other contracts to negotiate. They clearly did as they also signed Tavares. But, again, that was not a contract extension so when I said 3 contract extensions THAT WAS NOT A REFERENCE TO TAVARES.
"Big 3" was not a metaphor. I did not say "Big 3". I said BIG 3 EXTENSIONS.
Seriously LK, who is a smart person, did not have trouble with this basic use of language. Learn from him.