Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Making him captain was another unforced Treliving error. There was absolutely nothing wrong with Tavares as captain.I'm reading that the Leafs are going to meet with him to convince their hesitant captain to return for this coming season...which he's already under contract for.
If Matthews was properly excited to lead the Leafs this coming season, I have to think his agent would be on Sportsnet suggesting that report was a bologne sandwich.
Making him captain was another unforced Treliving error. There was absolutely nothing wrong with Tavares as captain.
Nothing about Matthews screamed out leader and that this needed to be done ASAP.
To be honest I was surprised that he was team USA's captain.
I don't see him as threatening anything. At season's end he said he couldn't predict the future on what direction the team was heading. And how could he? What if the new GM wants to trade him? He didn't know that either. We still don't know what direction the team is moving in. Are they going to rebuild, retool? Both Nylander and Matthews have reportedly asked for a few heavy, “dog”-type forwards up front and two puck-moving defencemen.I think this is all crazy. Matthews is the captain of the team, but floating that he's contemplating a trade demand?
You're the leader of the team, supposedly, but you're threatening to leave even though you're under contract?
Guys, I don't think he can come back as captain from this. What's next, he comes back, they hit a rough patch, and he wants out again?
And if none of this stuff in the media was true, he'd be in front of a mic saying things like "This is all hogwash, I'm fully commited to this team, really excited we're picking first overall, can't wait to get back to work...blah blah..."
Honestly, if I'm the Leafs, I don't think there's much choice here but to move on. Does anyone want a captain that's only half in?
what contending teams have had a player like McKenna (assuming he reaches his potential) as the centerpiece?I agree. And now the Leafs are in a great position to make this happen. Trade him for a high draft pick and draft the top notch defenseman we’ve been longing for for years to help built the team nucleus the proper way this time… with McKenna as the centrepiece
I cannot even think about that possibility, but man if you are right...If the Leafs do this really right, free McDavid joins the super team as Matthews re-ups for another couple of seasons
Cowan - McDavid - Nylander
Knies - Matthews - passer-Dawg
McKenna - Tavares - forecheck-Dawg
I can see McD going south. Clock is ticking in Edm, like T.O.If the Leafs do this really right, free McDavid joins the super team as Matthews re-ups for another couple of seasons
Cowan - McDavid - Nylander
Knies - Matthews - passer-Dawg
McKenna - Tavares - forecheck-Dawg
what contending teams have had a player like McKenna (assuming he reaches his potential) as the centerpiece?
I don’t normally put much stock in the idea of fickle Leaf fans running their best players out of town, but… the few posts above sure do have the whiff of it.
I don't see him as threatening anything. At season's end he said he couldn't predict the future on what direction the team was heading. And how could he? What if the new GM wants to trade him? He didn't know that either. We still don't know what direction the team is moving in. Are they going to rebuild, retool? Both Nylander and Matthews have reportedly asked for a few heavy, “dog”-type forwards up front and two puck-moving defencemen.
How come no one is freaking out about Nylander saying he's not interested in staying if the team engages in a full rebuild, though he is open to a retool.
Kind of feels like both are of the same mindset yet no one talks about 88. Just that 34 wants out....well maybe.
So if they decide to rebuild, we can look at both leaving and I don't blame either one.
I prefer to wait and see what Mats and Chayka are planning first before worrying if 88 or 34 are staying.
He's the captain of the team and has two years on an NMC. This is a softball question. No one is talking about Nylander because he never said anything about not wanting to come back next season and he's on a very long deal.I don't see him as threatening anything. At season's end he said he couldn't predict the future on what direction the team was heading. And how could he? What if the new GM wants to trade him? He didn't know that either. We still don't know what direction the team is moving in. Are they going to rebuild, retool? Both Nylander and Matthews have reportedly asked for a few heavy, “dog”-type forwards up front and two puck-moving defencemen.
How come no one is freaking out about Nylander saying he's not interested in staying if the team engages in a full rebuild, though he is open to a retool.
Kind of feels like both are of the same mindset yet no one talks about 88. Just that 34 wants out....well maybe.
So if they decide to rebuild, we can look at both leaving and I don't blame either one.
I prefer to wait and see what Mats and Chayka are planning first before worrying if 88 or 34 are staying.
I don’t know if it’s unanimous that they’ve really been a contender since he became the centerpiece. Their results over the last 4 seasons could support another argument.I'd say Kucherov
So what does Nylander saying he doesn't want to stick around if they're rebuilding mean?He's the captain of the team and has two years on an NMC. This is a softball question. No one is talking about Nylander because he never said anything about not wanting to come back next season and he's on a very long deal.