OldTimeHockey
Active member
Essentially..not much goin' on
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Corn Flake said:Luongo to Florida, Theodore to Toronto.
$5 bet placed. 8)
With Markstrom waiting in the wings, I don't see Florida having any interest in Luongo.Corn Flake said:Luongo to Florida, Theodore to Toronto.
$5 bet placed. 8)
Mr. Leaf said:With Markstrom waiting in the wings, I don't see Florida having any interest in Luongo.Corn Flake said:Luongo to Florida, Theodore to Toronto.
$5 bet placed. 8)
Mr. Leaf said:With Markstrom waiting in the wings, I don't see Florida having any interest in Luongo.Corn Flake said:Luongo to Florida, Theodore to Toronto.
$5 bet placed. 8)
Mr. Leaf said:With Markstrom waiting in the wings, I don't see Florida having any interest in Luongo.
louisstamos said:Mr. Leaf said:With Markstrom waiting in the wings, I don't see Florida having any interest in Luongo.Corn Flake said:Luongo to Florida, Theodore to Toronto.
$5 bet placed. 8)
Luongo to Florida, Markstrom to Toronto?
caveman said:Theodore makes a lot more sense for Toronto.
BlueWhiteBlood said:caveman said:Theodore makes a lot more sense for Toronto.
Unfortunately, if that scenario played out, we'd likely lose Scrivens. I have my doubts that Scrivens would get through waivers.
Corn Flake said:Mr. Leaf said:With Markstrom waiting in the wings, I don't see Florida having any interest in Luongo.Corn Flake said:Luongo to Florida, Theodore to Toronto.
$5 bet placed. 8)
Well we have Reimer, Scrivens, Ouwya, etc etc etc and I would take Luongo to solidify the position, even with the crazy contract. You can have him and Markstrom as the backup for a long while.
CarltonTheBear said:BlueWhiteBlood said:caveman said:Theodore makes a lot more sense for Toronto.
Unfortunately, if that scenario played out, we'd likely lose Scrivens. I have my doubts that Scrivens would get through waivers.
I don't think there's a single team in the NHL that I would say Scrivens would be a top-2 goalie on (except the Leafs of course). And most teams have a 3rd goalie that they would probably go to before considering Scrivens if an injury came up or something.
OldTimeHockey said:I highly disagree. Scrivens is a better goalie than Gustavsson and he was signed. Why wouldn't a dirt cheap option in Scrivens be picked up for insurance?
OldTimeHockey said:I highly disagree. Scrivens is a better goalie than Gustavsson and he was signed. Why wouldn't a dirt cheap option in Scrivens be picked up for insurance?
Bullfrog said:OldTimeHockey said:I highly disagree. Scrivens is a better goalie than Gustavsson and he was signed. Why wouldn't a dirt cheap option in Scrivens be picked up for insurance?
I'm not even remotely convinced Scrivens is better than Gustavsson. I think he's got potential to be better, but I'd have to see some NHL success out of Scrivens first.