Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jonzo said:Do the Leafs even have the assets to get this guy?
CarltonTheBear said:Eklund is saying it's Penner, Hunter, Bernier, and a pick. That'd be a bigger fleecing than the Phaneuf deal.
Erndog said:Larry Brooks writes that in addition to Dubinksy, Kreider and a #1, CBJ wants a combo of players including Derek Stepan, Ryan McDonagh, Michael Del Zotto, Artem Anisimov and Carl Hagelin.
Also, I can't remember who said it (Kypreos? Cox? Scott Morrison?) but they believed Columbus is looking for 4 young assets. So it looks like that probably holds water.
Not sure exactly what we could offer but it would probably take something like Kulemin, Schenn, Kadri and a 1st. High price indeed.
Erndog said:Not sure exactly what we could offer but it would probably take something like Kulemin, Schenn, Kadri and a 1st. High price indeed.
Corn Flake said:Erndog said:Larry Brooks writes that in addition to Dubinksy, Kreider and a #1, CBJ wants a combo of players including Derek Stepan, Ryan McDonagh, Michael Del Zotto, Artem Anisimov and Carl Hagelin.
Also, I can't remember who said it (Kypreos? Cox? Scott Morrison?) but they believed Columbus is looking for 4 young assets. So it looks like that probably holds water.
Not sure exactly what we could offer but it would probably take something like Kulemin, Schenn, Kadri and a 1st. High price indeed.
I can see why CBJ would ask for the moon right now for Nash. Why not? They don't have to trade him at the deadline but might as well try and see if a team will go off their rockers to get him. Could they get a team to bite on some massive offer? I think they can.
I can't see NYR blowing a hole that big in their team, not based on that list of players CBJ wants. No team guts themselves like that this close to the finish line. I think given where the Leafs are in their evolution as a team they could more afford to blow a big hole in the roster vs. the Rangers risking damage to what looks like a contender.
Erndog said:Larry Brooks writes that in addition to Dubinksy, Kreider and a #1, CBJ wants a combo of players including Derek Stepan, Ryan McDonagh, Michael Del Zotto, Artem Anisimov and Carl Hagelin.
Also, I can't remember who said it (Kypreos? Cox? Scott Morrison?) but they believed Columbus is looking for 4 young assets. So it looks like that probably holds water.
Not sure exactly what we could offer but it would probably take something like Kulemin, Schenn, Kadri and a 1st. High price indeed.
Sudafederov said:Not sure it's a comparable, but Thornton went for 3 assets.
If Burke did land Nash (RW), where do you slot him in the line up?
Regarding the part in bold, it is a bit of a stretch to call what Thornton went for assets.Sudafederov said:Erndog said:Larry Brooks writes that in addition to Dubinksy, Kreider and a #1, CBJ wants a combo of players including Derek Stepan, Ryan McDonagh, Michael Del Zotto, Artem Anisimov and Carl Hagelin.
Also, I can't remember who said it (Kypreos? Cox? Scott Morrison?) but they believed Columbus is looking for 4 young assets. So it looks like that probably holds water.
Not sure exactly what we could offer but it would probably take something like Kulemin, Schenn, Kadri and a 1st. High price indeed.
Not sure it's a comparable, but Thornton went for 3 assets.
If Burke did land Nash (RW), where do you slot him in the line up?
IIRC Boston gave up on Thornton and gave him up for no assets. I do think CBJ will want more than what BOS was willing to accept for ThortonWhatIfGodWasALeaf said:Regarding the part in bold, it is a bit of a stretch to call what Thornton went for assets.Sudafederov said:Erndog said:Larry Brooks writes that in addition to Dubinksy, Kreider and a #1, CBJ wants a combo of players including Derek Stepan, Ryan McDonagh, Michael Del Zotto, Artem Anisimov and Carl Hagelin.
Also, I can't remember who said it (Kypreos? Cox? Scott Morrison?) but they believed Columbus is looking for 4 young assets. So it looks like that probably holds water.
Not sure exactly what we could offer but it would probably take something like Kulemin, Schenn, Kadri and a 1st. High price indeed.
Not sure it's a comparable, but Thornton went for 3 assets.
If Burke did land Nash (RW), where do you slot him in the line up?
JohnK's Revenge said:Would anyone do Kessel + for Nash.
CBJ gets slightly cheaper but younger allstar. TML get a 1st line winger with more size albeit older and more expensive but with a longer contract.
Peter D. said:Also, the perceived lack of thirst of wanting to play in a big hockey market makes me question whether he would actually thrive in a market like Toronto.
Peter D. said:Is it wrong to not really want Nash? I've never overly bought into the hype, I don't think he is the primary target we should expend a chunk of assets on, and I think the cap hit could be put to better use.
Also, the perceived lack of thirst of wanting to play in a big hockey market makes me question whether he would actually thrive in a market like Toronto.
I'm not against giving up a lot (Kadri/Schenn/1st) to get another cornerstone player; I'm just not convinced it's Nash.
Sudafederov said:Not sure it's a comparable, but Thornton went for 3 assets.
Corn Flake said:Peter D. said:Also, the perceived lack of thirst of wanting to play in a big hockey market makes me question whether he would actually thrive in a market like Toronto.
We don't really know that to be the case though, do we?
I guess it depends on what his list of teams looks like.
Erndog said:JohnK's Revenge said:Would anyone do Kessel + for Nash.
CBJ gets slightly cheaper but younger allstar. TML get a 1st line winger with more size albeit older and more expensive but with a longer contract.
Why the heck would WE do that?
So trade one potential 30-40 goal guy for another potential 30-40 goal guy?
We have the one thats 3-4 years younger... the one with $2.5M less on the cap... AND we have to give up MORE to acquire Nash?
It's non sensical.
You deal for Nash because you want to have 2 potential 40 goal guys, not just 1.