J
Jalili
Guest
I wouldn't put it past the brass in Edmonton to take Yakupov and then ship out some other players for help on their back-end. Even it doesn't make any sense they'll probably come up with some crazy plan.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kush said:I wouldn't put it past the brass in Edmonton to take Yakupov and then ship out some other players for help on their back-end. Even it doesn't make any sense they'll probably come up with some crazy plan.
Boston Leaf said:Sarge said:Schenn + #5 for #1 8)
Id do that
princedpw said:Kush said:I wouldn't put it past the brass in Edmonton to take Yakupov and then ship out some other players for help on their back-end. Even it doesn't make any sense they'll probably come up with some crazy plan.
Why wouldn't taking Yakupov at #1 and then filling their other needs by trade make sense?
princedpw said:Kush said:I wouldn't put it past the brass in Edmonton to take Yakupov and then ship out some other players for help on their back-end. Even it doesn't make any sense they'll probably come up with some crazy plan.
Why wouldn't taking Yakupov at #1 and then filling their other needs by trade make sense?
Kush said:I wouldn't put it past the brass in Edmonton to take Yakupov and then ship out some other players for help on their back-end. Even it doesn't make any sense they'll probably come up with some crazy plan.
Kush said:princedpw said:Kush said:I wouldn't put it past the brass in Edmonton to take Yakupov and then ship out some other players for help on their back-end. Even it doesn't make any sense they'll probably come up with some crazy plan.
Why wouldn't taking Yakupov at #1 and then filling their other needs by trade make sense?
The structure of their team would be built around 3 scoring wingers and 1 undersized center (albeit all 4 will probably end up being stars), while being undersized down the middle and missing a back-end. Not saying it would be the wrong plan, but it just seems as if people are expecting their thought process to be: we have enough firepower up front, we need help in other areas.
Borschevsky-Antropov-Kulemin said:Kush said:I wouldn't put it past the brass in Edmonton to take Yakupov and then ship out some other players for help on their back-end. Even it doesn't make any sense they'll probably come up with some crazy plan.
I wouldn't put it past them, necessarily, but if they're at all impatient to make some significant improvement shortly I don't know that they have a ton of other players they could turn into a big improvement on their back-end.
If, on the other hand, they basically just threw it out there that Yakupov could be had by whatever team offered them the best collection of defenders/defensive prospects? I think they could take down a big haul.
princedpw said:Kush said:princedpw said:Kush said:I wouldn't put it past the brass in Edmonton to take Yakupov and then ship out some other players for help on their back-end. Even it doesn't make any sense they'll probably come up with some crazy plan.
Why wouldn't taking Yakupov at #1 and then filling their other needs by trade make sense?
The structure of their team would be built around 3 scoring wingers and 1 undersized center (albeit all 4 will probably end up being stars), while being undersized down the middle and missing a back-end. Not saying it would be the wrong plan, but it just seems as if people are expecting their thought process to be: we have enough firepower up front, we need help in other areas.
I thought the idea was that they might trade one of the other wingers for the defensive help ...
Sarge said:Schenn + #5 for #1 8)
Erndog said:I really want Forsberg or Galchenyuk.
Potvin29 said:I'm under the impression almost every 1st round Swedish player turns out to be pretty good, so Forsberg is okay with me too.
Erndog said:I stand by this. Obviously if neither are there at 5 that means Murray or Grigorenko are there and I'm okay with that.
Forsberg seems like he could have one of those real long, impactful careers like an Alfredsson.
bustaheims said:Erndog said:I stand by this. Obviously if neither are there at 5 that means Murray or Grigorenko are there and I'm okay with that.
Forsberg seems like he could have one of those real long, impactful careers like an Alfredsson.
Same here. I'd be very disappointed if they went with someone other than Galchenyuk/Grigorenko/Forsberg if one of them was still available.
Bender said:bustaheims said:Erndog said:I stand by this. Obviously if neither are there at 5 that means Murray or Grigorenko are there and I'm okay with that.
Forsberg seems like he could have one of those real long, impactful careers like an Alfredsson.
Same here. I'd be very disappointed if they went with someone other than Galchenyuk/Grigorenko/Forsberg if one of them was still available.
I would be surprised if one of them wasn't available.
Deebo said:If all 3 C's are gone, I'd be happy with Murray too.