bustaheims said:LeBrun says the Leafs are actually interested in seeing what Sill has to offer down the stretch, so, they obviously felt there was value there.
... was this supposed to make me feel better?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
bustaheims said:LeBrun says the Leafs are actually interested in seeing what Sill has to offer down the stretch, so, they obviously felt there was value there.
dappleganger said:I think the interesting question is would you rather have LA's first or Nashville's first.
Nik the Trik said:dappleganger said:I think the interesting question is would you rather have LA's first or Nashville's first.
On the whole? Probably Nashville's. I don't think there's a big difference though and I don't think that's a choice anyone had in front of them.
KW Sluggo said:So the NHL moved the trade deadline to today?
Whatever happened to "we're going to wait until the deadline to get the best deal"?
I guess the second rounder is okay but it means waiting until 2016 unless we can trade it as part of a package. The fourth rounder is meh (we aren't the Red Wings when it comes to later round picks) unless we can package it.
As for the player (who dat?) Marlies material I suppose.
Count me as largely unimpressed other than it beats what we got for Kuleman & Raymond as pmrules has pointed out.
Bullfrog said:KW Sluggo said:So the NHL moved the trade deadline to today?
Whatever happened to "we're going to wait until the deadline to get the best deal"?
I guess the second rounder is okay but it means waiting until 2016 unless we can trade it as part of a package. The fourth rounder is meh (we aren't the Red Wings when it comes to later round picks) unless we can package it.
As for the player (who dat?) Marlies material I suppose.
Count me as largely unimpressed other than it beats what we got for Kuleman & Raymond as pmrules has pointed out.
How much were you expecting to get for Winnik?
CarltonTheBear said:bustaheims said:LeBrun says the Leafs are actually interested in seeing what Sill has to offer down the stretch, so, they obviously felt there was value there.
... was this supposed to make me feel better?
Potvin29 said:CarltonTheBear said:bustaheims said:LeBrun says the Leafs are actually interested in seeing what Sill has to offer down the stretch, so, they obviously felt there was value there.
... was this supposed to make me feel better?
For tanking? Yes.
CarltonTheBear said:I'll give Sill one thing, he's a pretty funny hockey player.
Darryl said:Couple of picks and a warm body to fill out the rest of the season. Not a bad haul.
He's definatly got a fiery personality that could rub off on the younger Marlies players. Not sure if he'll be going out for steak dinners with Captain Bodie right away. lol.Frank E said:CarltonTheBear said:I'll give Sill one thing, he's a pretty funny hockey player.
I had to laugh, if I was Dion I would have said "you sure you're going to get a shift? I'll be out here all night waiting for you to get a shift."
Nik the Trik said:If Sill can skate a regular 4th line shift, throw some knuckles from time to time and fill in on the PK every now and again he's not the worst guy to bring in on a short-term basis.
Nik the Trik said:Does it strike anyone else as maybe being a touch odd that Winnik was worth a second and a fourth and Santorelli was only worth a prospect that, charitably, is about equivalent to a second? Or is this further evidence of just how unwilling teams are to part with 1st rounders and that trade was more of a package deal than we've assumed?