• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Your summer 2012 strategy?

Sarge said:
I totally agree that 2 or 3 of those guys should have been dealt for 1sts at the deadline. Hopefully, the guys in question are equally valuable to teams this summer and maybe that was Burke's line of thinking last month. We'll see what happens.  :-\

A long shot, but who knows?  Maybe he can still get someone to go for that.  But w/o the immediacy of the deadline, I doubt it.
 
bustaheims said:
Zee said:
This is what bothers me.  Leafs are always paying for Burke's mistakes and stupid moves.  Anyone could have seen that the first round picks would have been great, you get rid of players off the roster, clear up cap room, get picks back and build.  They're going to have to turn over this roster ANYWAY, why didn't he start at the deadline, admit he was wrong and move on?  Instead we get this...mess.

Yup, late first round picks in an extremely shallow draft and cap space for what is probably the worst UFA crop since this style of free agency was introduced into the NHL . . . that's what will turn this team around.

Is the status quo a better alternative then?
 
bustaheims said:
Yup, late first round picks in an extremely shallow draft and cap space for what is probably the worst UFA crop since this style of free agency was introduced into the NHL . . . that's what will turn this team around.

It's not just picks or who could be signed via UFA though. A big part of it is roster flexibility and potentially freeing up some room for Colborne or Ashtons or Kadri. Who knows - maybe a sleeper like Ross could wiggle in? Also, while you may not like mid/late first rounders, perhaps there a few guys other teams really have their sights on this June... Perhaps more so than MacArthur or Kulemin.
 
Saint Nik said:
Not that I want to wade into this too much but are we even entirely sure about those offers of first round picks and who they were for? I've heard a lot of speculation but nothing close to specifics.

Burke himself said it.

He said that the Leafs were offered "four first-round picks for players on the team" and trade offers for 12 players at the deadline.
 
Saint Nik said:
Not that I want to wade into this too much but are we even entirely sure about those offers of first round picks and who they were for? I've heard a lot of speculation but nothing close to specifics.

I guess it's possible that BB would just fabricate the offers as some kind of strategy for setting up a market in the summer, but I doubt it.  IIRC he named Mac, Schenn, Reimer, and one other. {EDIT: Kuly?}
 
Saint Nik said:
Not that I want to wade into this too much but are we even entirely sure about those offers of first round picks and who they were for? I've heard a lot of speculation but nothing close to specifics.

Yes we are entirely sure... Burke himself identified the 4 guys he was offered 1sts for. - One was a conditional 1st.
 
Here's from Burke's own mouth about the draft picks at the deadline:

Just after 11:50 mark "we turned down four first round picks"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bs1Td21cDU
 
Zee said:
Burke himself said it.

He said that the Leafs were offered "four first-round picks for players on the team" and trade offers for 12 players at the deadline.

Well, leaving aside that I'm not one to take the things out of Burke's mouth as gospel the more important thing there is who those picks were for. If we're talking Mac, Gus or Connolly it's an entirely different conversation than if it's Grabo, Gunnar or Schenn. 

Edit: Just to clarify, I'm not asking whether or not we're sure Burke said he was offered four first rounders. I'm asking if we have any idea what those trades would have actually looked like.
 
Saint Nik said:
Not that I want to wade into this too much but are we even entirely sure about those offers of first round picks and who they were for? I've heard a lot of speculation but nothing close to specifics.

Not only do we not know anything about those picks, but I've heard nothing that says either way as to whether those offers were for one, two, three or four different players.  For all we know, four different teams offered a first round pick for Grabovski, and that would still jive with what Burke actually said.
 
Sarge said:
Saint Nik said:
Not that I want to wade into this too much but are we even entirely sure about those offers of first round picks and who they were for? I've heard a lot of speculation but nothing close to specifics.

Yes we are entirely sure... Burke himself identified the 4 guys he was offered 1sts for. - One was a conditional 1st.

I don't recall that.  Does anybody have a quote?
 
I have a tough time deciding whether I'd unload Schenn for a 1st or not.  On one hand he's young and could get it together, on the other hand I'm beyond sick of a 3.6M guy who sets the tone of so many games with horrendous giveaways on his 1st shift. 

If he doesn't get it together the remaining years on that contract could he hard to unload, we could end up desperate just to unload them for nothing like Komi's.
 
Heroic Shrimp said:
Sarge said:
Saint Nik said:
Not that I want to wade into this too much but are we even entirely sure about those offers of first round picks and who they were for? I've heard a lot of speculation but nothing close to specifics.

Yes we are entirely sure... Burke himself identified the 4 guys he was offered 1sts for. - One was a conditional 1st.

I don't recall that.  Does anybody have a quote?

I don't have it but I'm 100% sure on this. - I'm 90% that the conditional pick was for Mac while two of the other players we were offered 1sts for were Grabs and Kulemin. The 4th was either Reimer or Schenn... I don't recall.
 
bustaheims said:
Yup, late first round picks in an extremely shallow draft and cap space for what is probably the worst UFA crop since this style of free agency was introduced into the NHL . . . that's what will turn this team around.

I don't necessarily disagree but, honestly, I really don't think you can base a ton on the perception of the draft as a whole. Scouts are dodgy enough in their evaluation of one player, so trying to peg the collective value of an entire round of the draft vs. years past doesn't really strike me as something to put a ton of stock into. 
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Bundled for lottery pick, yes, they sure would have been a start.  You sure can't even try for it if you don't have some 1sts in your quiver.

Sure, but, as I pointed out when this discussion happened shortly after the trade deadline, trading up into the upper stratosphere of the draft is nigh impossible, regardless of what assets you have in your quiver - especially in today's league, where price performance is vitally important.
 
Saint Nik said:
I don't necessarily disagree but, honestly, I really don't think you can base a ton on the perception of the draft as a whole. Scouts are dodgy enough in their evaluation of one player, so trying to peg the collective value of an entire round of the draft vs. years past doesn't really strike me as something to put a ton of stock into.

Maybe not, but, when it's a virtually unanimous opinion that the talent level essentially falls off a cliff after the first 10-12 guys, I'm not exactly left in awe of the potential of the guys likely to be drafted in the 20s - certainly not to the point where I'd deal off assets with reasonable term remaining on their contracts, and especially not with the barren free agent market we'll see this summer. Many of the guys who were not dealt at the deadline will have similar (or possibly greater) value in the summer for teams looking to improve and not feeling there are UFAs that are available (or affordable) to help them. Burke can very likely pick up more tangible assets for guys like MacArthur in the summer (prospects, young players, etc), package them for upgrades or, at the very least, pick up equivalent picks in the 2013 draft.
 
Sarge said:
I don't have it but I'm 100% sure on this. - I'm 90% that the conditional pick was for Mac while two of the other players we were offered 1sts for were Grabs and Kulemin. The 4th was either Reimer or Schenn... I don't recall.

The most specific thing I recall Burke saying was that he had a solid offer for Reimer, whatever that means. He also said he could have "traded the entire second line for 1st rounders," which was likely hyperbole on his part.
 
bustaheims said:
Sarge said:
I don't have it but I'm 100% sure on this. - I'm 90% that the conditional pick was for Mac while two of the other players we were offered 1sts for were Grabs and Kulemin. The 4th was either Reimer or Schenn... I don't recall.

The most specific thing I recall Burke saying was that he had a solid offer for Reimer, whatever that means. He also said he could have "traded the entire second line for 1st rounders," which was likely hyperbole on his part.

There may have been another quote from Burke with more specifics but I believe the offers were substantiated elsewhere too. Dreger? Bobby Mac? - I don't remember but like I said, I'm fairly certain the only guy mentioned who we did not get a frim offer for a 1st was MacArthur (who we got a conditional 1st offer for.) Does anyone else remember this?
 
Sarge said:
There may have been another quote from Burke with more specifics but I believe the offers were substantiated elsewhere too. Dreger? Bobby Mac? - I don't remember but like I said, I'm fairly certain the only guy mentioned who we did not get a frim offer for a 1st was MacArthur (who we got a conditional 1st offer for.) Does anyone else remember this?

As a general rule of thumb, anything that comes from outside the organization (or from an unnamed source) has to be viewed with a fair amount of skepticism, regardless of who it's from - it still has a high probability of being inaccurate, while anything that comes directly from the organization on this type of subject has to be taken with a pinch of salt, so to speak, as it's likely painted with hyperbole or an agenda.
 
The problem is, Burke does nothing at the deadline, then fires Wilson that week and brings in Carlyle.  Maybe he was hoping that Carlyle would suddenly turn the same roster around and make them play great, but that hasn't happened.  Now he faces the prospect of trading / cutting players who Carlyle can't work with, and starting again with new players and seeing if Carlyle can do something with the new team. 

Had part of the players leaving been MacArthur, Grabovski and Kulemin as has been speculated, how bad would that have been considering all 3 disappeared during the long losing streak, Grabovski included?  Instead we reward Grabovski with a 5 year, $5.5M deal. 

Who knows the specifics of the deals, but if he had been able to stock-pile 4 first round picks, in addition to the Leafs own pick that would be 5 in the first round, they MIGHT have been able to make a trade in the summer for a #1 center.  Maybe Bozak can then become the #2 center where he might a better fit than he currently is, and replace the departed Grabovski at a much cheaper price.  We'll never know now.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top