herman said:
herman said:
Bullfrog said:
Why put Engvall up over Kerfoot? I'd go back to an 8-minute 4th line.
Player 1 | Player 2 | GP | TOI | GF/60 | GA/60 | GF% | xGF/60 | xGA/60 | xGF% |
David Kampf | Pierre Engvall | 26 | 182.6 | 0.99 | 0.33 | 75 | 2.27 | 1.81 | 55.58 |
David Kampf | w/o Pierre Engvall | 26 | 120.0 | 3 | 4 | 42.86 | 1.85 | 2.79 | 39.92 |
w/o David Kampf | Pierre Engvall | 26 | 94.1 | 3.19 | 2.55 | 55.56 | 3.78 | 3 | 55.76 |
w/o David Kampf | w/o Pierre Engvall | 26 | 881.3 | 2.66 | 2.04 | 56.52 | 2.96 | 2.23 | 56.99 |
Kampf is a better shutdown centre with Engvall than without. Engvall is better with Kampf.
You can get Kerfoot special teams minutes. He is otherwise a 5v5 passenger.
Source:
NaturalStatTrick
https://twitter.com/draglikepull/status/1468590007334154240
Ritchie has played 1/3 of the time Engvall has with Kampf/Kase.
So far...
Ritchie with Kampf 3GF, 4GA and Kase 4GF, 2GA.
Engvall with Kampf 3GF, 1GA, Kase 3GF, 3GA.