• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

AA leaving?

CarltonTheBear said:
Generally curious, what would the reaction have been if AA walked away or was fired exactly a year ago today? I don't really recall him being extremely liked by Jays fans. I get why this year would change his perception quite a bit, but going "all-in" is probably the easiest move a GM can make. Particularly one who knew that his contract was coming to an end and had nothing to lose.
The end result is stellar and most are coming back. It was not all now or nothing.
 
cabber24 said:
Potvin29 said:
cabber24 said:
I hate this... I would like to see another GM pull a Tulo out of their ass.

What about a Syndergaard?
They had a tonne of pitching prospects at the time and Dickie was the current CY Young winner.

Who was almost 40 years old and had major question marks around his ability to repeat that kind of season. The Dickey trade was a bad trade.
 
bustaheims said:
Who was almost 40 years old and had major question marks around his ability to repeat that kind of season. The Dickey trade was a bad trade.

At the very least they overpaid by a considerable amount. If you look at, say, the Doc trade or what the Phillies got for Hamel or the Rays for Price, the Jays paid 30 year old fireballer prices for a 40 year old knuckleball pitcher.
 
Dickey trade sucked for sure, my earlier comments where not directed at AA having a hand in the scouting but that his previous scouting experience certainly didnt hurt his decision making when it came to the draft table.
Anyway its a shitty way to run a business and Shapiro better be good.
 
Highlander said:
Dickey trade sucked for sure, my earlier comments where not directed at AA having a hand in the scouting but that his previous scouting experience certainly didnt hurt his decision making when it came to the draft table.
Anyway its a shitty way to run a business and Shapiro better be good.

Again, they offered AA a contract. The dispute isn't about money. So what about this is a bad way to run a business? The fact that they didn't look at AA's tenure and say that he shouldn't have to answer to anyone? That they didn't think he was perfect?

Absent knowing the specifics of why he's leaving, what are you criticizing the Blue Jays for?
 
Nik the Trik said:
Highlander said:
Dickey trade sucked for sure, my earlier comments where not directed at AA having a hand in the scouting but that his previous scouting experience certainly didnt hurt his decision making when it came to the draft table.
Anyway its a shitty way to run a business and Shapiro better be good.

Again, they offered AA a contract. The dispute isn't about money. So what about this is a bad way to run a business? The fact that they didn't look at AA's tenure and say that he shouldn't have to answer to anyone? That they didn't think he was perfect?

Absent knowing the specifics of why he's leaving, what are you criticizing the Blue Jays for?
Personally, I wish AA had Shapiro's job if it's one or the other I want AA.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Highlander said:
Dickey trade sucked for sure, my earlier comments where not directed at AA having a hand in the scouting but that his previous scouting experience certainly didnt hurt his decision making when it came to the draft table.
Anyway its a shitty way to run a business and Shapiro better be good.

Again, they offered AA a contract. The dispute isn't about money. So what about this is a bad way to run a business? The fact that they didn't look at AA's tenure and say that he shouldn't have to answer to anyone? That they didn't think he was perfect?

Absent knowing the specifics of why he's leaving, what are you criticizing the Blue Jays for?

Somehow maybe creating the conditions that make AA want to leave?
 
bustaheims said:
cabber24 said:
Potvin29 said:
cabber24 said:
I hate this... I would like to see another GM pull a Tulo out of their ass.

What about a Syndergaard?
They had a tonne of pitching prospects at the time and Dickie was the current CY Young winner.

Who was almost 40 years old and had major question marks around his ability to repeat that kind of season. The Dickey trade was a bad trade.
They were world series favorites going into that season.
 
cabber24 said:
They were world series favorites going into that season.

Because they made some headline grabbing moves in the offseason. The Padres were among the favourites coming into this season for the same reason. Being the media selected favourites means absolutely zero. How did it work out for them?
 
bustaheims said:
cabber24 said:
They were world series favorites going into that season.

Because they made some headline grabbing moves in the offseason. The Padres were among the favourites coming into this season for the same reason. Being the media selected favourites means absolutely zero. How did it work out for them?
I obviously wish the trade never happened but hind sight is 20-20. Bottom line is at the end of the day AA has built an amazing product which happens to include some crappy trades along the way.
 
cabber24 said:
I obviously wish the trade never happened but hind sight is 20-20. Bottom line is at the end of the day AA has built an amazing product which happens to include some crappy trades along the way.

Except that's not the bottom line. Things like price performance and sustainability matter. Constructing a team that made the playoffs one year isn't the be all and end all of team building.
 
Nik the Trik said:
I think the only troubling thing with this is that the success of whatever AA tried to do this year depended a lot on keeping this current group together and seeing it begin to unravel might signal even bigger changes.

I think it might be tougher than some think to keep the group together past next season.

Donaldson, Bautista, Martin and Encarnacion cost the team 31M in 2015. By 2017 those 5 could easily cost 80M by then, throw in Tulo and that's 100M on five players. Even if the Jays go as high as 160M, they won't be able to keep that offense, fill out the rest of the line up, and afford a quality pitching staff. Not to mention that none of those 5 are exactly young.
 
For AA to turn down a 5 year deal to stay with the Jays after the incredible success of the past few months there has to be a serious divide between ownership/Shapiro and himself.
As others have mentioned this is an incredibly frustrating turn of events as it kills some of the positive momentum the Jays were starting to garner.

Lots of questions to answer:

Who will be GM? Will Shapiro take on a duel president/GM role or bring someone else in as GM?

What does this mean for the future of Gibby and the coaching staff?

How does this affect the free agent market? Will the Jays lose free agents like Price and Estrada who were brought to town by AA?
 
Captain Canuck said:
How does this affect the free agent market? Will the Jays lose free agents like Price and Estrada who were brought to town by AA?

I really don't see this changing the chance of signing either of those guys. Those two are going to be looking to get paid, they've got no loyalty to the guy who traded for them.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Captain Canuck said:
How does this affect the free agent market? Will the Jays lose free agents like Price and Estrada who were brought to town by AA?

I really don't see this changing the chance of signing either of those guys. Those two are going to be looking to get paid, they've got no loyalty to the guy who traded for them.

How do you know they don't have any loyalty toward AA? Those two pitchers are GOING to get paid, they won't be looking for it.

What does it say about an organization that can't re-sign their GM, that by all accounts, they really wanted to re-sign?
 
This probably explains plenty:

When Mark Shapiro was hired as the president of the Toronto Blue Jays at the end of August, replacing Paul Beeston, the move signalled a full-scale culture shift for a franchise that has done business essentially the same way since the earliest days of its existence.

......

Among the Blue Jays? current staff there is still direct lineage going back not just to the glory days of the late ?80s and early ?90s, but to that first April afternoon when Doug Ault briefly became a household name. Beeston dated back even farther than that ? he was hired to look after the books as the team?s first employee.

Anthopoulos was a product of that old culture (though he also chafed against it at times, and though he in fact began his career with the Montreal Expos.) It was within the Blue Jays organization that he learned the ropes, that he quickly rose through the ranks and that he was given an opportunity to run the team at a very early stage in his career.

...the fact that Beeston gave him a shot after the firing of J.P. Ricciardi rather than going out and hiring a new general manager from elsewhere was a very Blue Jays thing to do. So was the fact that Anthopoulos was granted a significant degree of autonomy in running the baseball side of the business. There were payroll parameters, and occasionally Beeston or ownership intervened to push or block a trade or a signing. But beyond that, Anthopoulos could shape the organization as he liked, hire the field manager he wanted, and make whatever deals he could as long as he didn?t spend outside the bounds of his budget.

t wasn?t going to be like that anymore, and Anthopoulos knew it. He knew it as far back as last fall, when stories surfaced about the possible hiring of Dan Duquette or Kenny Williams as team president ? both of them with baseball operations pedigrees. Maybe they could work something out, which allowed him to retain his autonomy, to retain the final say on personnel matters. But that would be a long shot, even if there was a pre-existing relationship.

Shapiro he didn?t know at all, and the former Cleveland Indians GM and president came from a different place, where they did things differently, where there were different loyalties, where there was a very different history. He is by all accounts a detail person, a memo person, a meeting person ? none of which are labels anyone would apply to Beeston. He will make the Jays more button down, more efficient, more modern, and more a part of a larger communications company.


Story:
http://www.sportsnet.ca/baseball/mlb/anthopoulos-exit-a-product-of-blue-jays-culture-shift/
 
Nik the Troll said:
How do you know they don't have any loyalty toward AA?

Because it wouldn't be based on anything. AA didn't do anything for them. They've been in the organization for less than a year.

Nik the Troll said:
What does it say about an organization that can't re-sign their GM, that by all accounts, they really wanted to re-sign?

Nothing inherently. Especially not if that GM didn't want any sort of oversight as he built an unsustainable team.
 
Ken Rosenthal reports that the 5 year deal had a year 1 out clause if AA just couldn't take it with Shapiro.

I think this is Rogers coming out and saying 'hey we tried'. Honestly I can make an argument for both sides here...


Sources: #BlueJays? five-year offer to Anthopoulos gave him right to opt out after one year if relationship with Shapiro was not working.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top