OldTimeHockey
Active member
I believe Holmberg has a role to play on the roster. I'm not sure they knew where that was under Keefe. Hopefully under a new system, his strengths are highlighted.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CarltonTheBear said:cw said:I'm not sure he's ideal but I don't mind Holmberg either. I thought he took a step in the right direction last season. Flashed some versatility.
Holmberg to me is like the world's greatest 13th forward. I'm still not a big believer in him as a regular roster player though.
CarltonTheBear said:cw said:I'm not sure he's ideal but I don't mind Holmberg either. I thought he took a step in the right direction last season. Flashed some versatility.
Holmberg to me is like the world's greatest 13th forward. I'm still not a big believer in him as a regular roster player though.
herman said:Holmberg is a Swedish Connor Brown (without the junior accolades riding shotgun to a Connor McDavid). He?s another guy I think fits in better with a Berube style vs Keefe?s. He?s not far removed from being a 1LW on an SHL championship squad and has some clutchiness for ugly goals.
Frank E said:If it's a choice, I'd take Bertuzzi over him.
Dappleganger said:I have a hard time believing Marner would waive his no trade clause to go to Columbus.
CarltonTheBear said:Dappleganger said:I have a hard time believing Marner would waive his no trade clause to go to Columbus.
With all due respect to BD, the whole "my friend heard this from a source" type rumours should have virtually no credibility but aside from that I don't think Columbus is a crazy potential destination for Marner.
Not TOO far from home, which I think will be important to him. Smaller market, again a hunch tells me is something he might/maybe/could prefer. And Columbus is probably in a position (desperate) where they're willing to offer Marner the type of contract he's looking for. For all 3 reasons it makes more sense than say a team like Vegas that everyone likes to connect him to.
Bender said:I did think Columbus was plausible until I heard they wanted to cut payroll... Also I'd be reticent to take on Laine for our first even with retention. He's a reclamation project like PLD to some extent now.
bustaheims said:Bender said:I did think Columbus was plausible until I heard they wanted to cut payroll... Also I'd be reticent to take on Laine for our first even with retention. He's a reclamation project like PLD to some extent now.
Also, if Columbus were to acquire Marner, I have to imagine part of the reason would be to play him with Laine to try to improve his value. A divorce there feel inevitable, and I know they're exploring that possibility this off-season, but between his contract, the inconsistent performances, and his enrollment in the player assistance program, his value is at rock bottom.
CarltonTheBear said:bustaheims said:Bender said:I did think Columbus was plausible until I heard they wanted to cut payroll... Also I'd be reticent to take on Laine for our first even with retention. He's a reclamation project like PLD to some extent now.
Also, if Columbus were to acquire Marner, I have to imagine part of the reason would be to play him with Laine to try to improve his value. A divorce there feel inevitable, and I know they're exploring that possibility this off-season, but between his contract, the inconsistent performances, and his enrollment in the player assistance program, his value is at rock bottom.
I also very much doubt that they would move Werenski in a deal like this as it'd very much be a two steps forward one step back sorta thing for them. If a Marner to Columbus trade were to happen, and again I'm not holding my breathe or anything, it would be a more futures (and cap space) heavy return surrounding at least 1 (but ideally two) of Kent Johnson, David Jiricek, and their 4th overall pick.
Someone has to play centre in CLB. Any team would be lucky to have him on his current contract.Frank E said:CarltonTheBear said:bustaheims said:Bender said:I did think Columbus was plausible until I heard they wanted to cut payroll... Also I'd be reticent to take on Laine for our first even with retention. He's a reclamation project like PLD to some extent now.
Also, if Columbus were to acquire Marner, I have to imagine part of the reason would be to play him with Laine to try to improve his value. A divorce there feel inevitable, and I know they're exploring that possibility this off-season, but between his contract, the inconsistent performances, and his enrollment in the player assistance program, his value is at rock bottom.
I also very much doubt that they would move Werenski in a deal like this as it'd very much be a two steps forward one step back sorta thing for them. If a Marner to Columbus trade were to happen, and again I'm not holding my breathe or anything, it would be a more futures (and cap space) heavy return surrounding at least 1 (but ideally two) of Kent Johnson, David Jiricek, and their 4th overall pick.
How about Boone Jenner?