• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Game of Thrones (S7)

herman said:
WhatIfGodWasALeaf said:
It was incredible, don't risk some MAJOR spoilers by waiting.

The spoilers have been around for about a year, in writing, but they weren't readily accepted until the premier of this season.

That's true, I've found social media goes a little spoiler crazy when it's a leaked episode though.
 
WhatIfGodWasALeaf said:
It was incredible, don't risk some MAJOR spoilers by waiting. 

I don't know if this was 'Spoils of War' good, at least as far as judging just an individual episode goes, but it was very close. I do have some nitpicks, which I'll talk about after it airs, but it was still a damn entertaining episode. I'll probably watch it again soon.
 
Credit where it's due, that shuffling mass of zombie corpses has a much better underwater salvage operation than I thought.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Credit where it's due, that shuffling mass of zombie corpses has a much better underwater salvage operation than I thought.

It's a good thing they just happened to have those lying around eh.

This season's had some of the coolest stuff happen but the writers sometimes can't come up with good explanation for why/how. Like I said before, I think that's the effect of not being able to use anything Martin's thought of now. 

Benji's "there's no time!" line also made me laugh. What an awesome entrance/appearance for him and then he just gets himself killed.
 
I think I'm in the minority here but I thought that episode was ridiculous. Jon is always saved by some extraneous crap just when it looks like all is lost. Doing it literally ever time loses its effect. I think by the end of the episode I just became numb as to who lived and who died because it seems like such a wacky, logic free world now.

Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk

 
Bender said:
I think I'm in the minority here but I thought that episode was ridiculous. Jon is always saved by some extraneous crap just when it looks like all is lost. Doing it literally ever time loses its effect. I think by the end of the episode I just became numb as to who lived and who died because it seems like such a wacky, logic free world now.

Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk

I didn't actually notice how similar this episode was to the Battle of the Bastards until I watched it the second time.
 
I'm really not crazy about how Arya's acting. She's drastically overreacting to that letter, which the rest of her family didn't take seriously for a second. I mean if she only told Sansa how she got it she'd be able to clearly explain that this is all Littlefinger just trying to stir the pot.
 
Bender said:
I think I'm in the minority here but I thought that episode was ridiculous. Jon is always saved by some extraneous crap just when it looks like all is lost. Doing it literally ever time loses its effect. I think by the end of the episode I just became numb as to who lived and who died because it seems like such a wacky, logic free world now.

I actually think you're going to be in fairly strong company on this one. For instance, here's Alan Sepinwall writing at Uproxx:

When the scope is this gigantic, and the action this exciting, it should be simple to shrug off the idiot plot and the schmuckbait and just bask in the visual extravaganza. But Game of Thrones should be ? and has been ? better than a lot of this Perils of Pauline foolishness, and it keeps drawing attention to its weakest ideas. If you don?t want to kill off Jon Snow because he?s important to the endgame, that?s fine, but then don?t keep pretending like you are about to kill him sometime in the next five seconds!

?Beyond the Wall? represented many of the very best things this series can do, but also some of the worst and laziest tricks it leans on, repeatedly, when all else falls. But hey? zombie bears and zombie dragons, oh my!

And here's Alison Herman at the Ringer:

The final shot of ?Beyond the Wall? is genuinely chilling. Yet the obvious corner-cutting Thrones has done to get to that pre-scripted reveal promptly kneecaps its potential impact. Sometimes, the yadda-yadda-ing is merely distracting, pulling us out of the show?s simulated reality to ask ourselves, ?Wait, what?!? At other points, however, it feels contrary to the spirit of what makes Game of Thrones so special in the first place. Having Beric, Gendry, the Hound, Jorah, and Tormund?who won?t stop talking about a ?ship that was improvised and then GIFed to oblivion in the definition of fan service?live to fight another day runs counter to Thrones? favorite theme about the price of war. Meanwhile, Jon?s half-baked scheme reads in retrospect like a blatant excuse to get Viserion in the line of fire: plot being retroactively imposed on characters rather than organically generated by their actions.

That seems to be a general theme among criticism of the show right now. Where once this show seemed subversive, twisting our concepts of fantasy on it's head(people who do brave but foolish things get mercked) now seems pretty conventional.

Some people seem to be really digging the spectacle. Ice Zombies and Dragons and huge naval battles and that's fair enough. Personally, I saw the Lord of the Rings movies. I've seen neat fantasy set pieces rendered into computer graphics. I'm down for some more but that itself doesn't do much for me. Spectacle without intelligence is Michael Bay.

Personally I'm not that down on the show, I've sort of accepted I need to switch my brain off for it these days and I never really figured the show would end with the Night King winning, but I will miss the show that got such great dramatic mileage out of Tyrion moving a chair across a room or scenes like Robert and Cersei going over their sham marriage. That seems like a long ways away.

(Also, while I appreciate that the show doesn't seem to want to take hard moral stands on the actions of some of its characters are they maybe steering too hard into whatever skeevy demographic apparently wanted Luke and Leia to make out some more in Star Wars? Trying to make us feel some empathy for a messed up brother-sister romance is one thing but the Aunt-Nephew thing they're leaning hard into isn't something I'm dying to see explored further)
 
CarltonTheBear said:
I've yet to meet a single person who thought the "let's kidnap a wight" plan made a lick of sense.

Yeah, it's a weird one. Especially as Cersei effectively has a zombie henchman of her own. Seems unlikely she'd just immediately believe Jon or Tyrion that the Zombie they have is proof of what they say as opposed to some other kind of magic nonsense.

 
The problem with GoT since they've outpaced Martin's writing has been the showrunners' about-face on how the show built its cachet to begin with. And now they're clearly tired of the travel and the time and the set up.

They cut some fluff in the earlier seasons, but there was some clear meandering so as not to overtake the books, which gave a lot of time for characters to blossom. They also had a great deal of Martin's dialog to work with.

Beyond the books, we're seeing a lot of lazy writing. They seem to spitball out set pieces and spectacles first, then reverse engineering motivations. They're not very good at reverse engineering. As such, it has leaned towards far more conventional fantasy elements, rather than the realism that was the original intent.

Now they've capped their time and money investment, and dumped it pretty much entirely into the spectacle. Writing is shortcut further by simply recalling season 1 dialog and leaning on characterization that was developed earlier and just doing "oh I know yous". It's cheapening the product, but I see why they've done it. Same thing happened to other great shows that did not build an end game properly (BSG, Rome S2).

All that being said,
https://twitter.com/ringer/status/899451756618276864
www.twitter.com/ringer/status/899451756618276864
 
CarltonTheBear said:
I'm really not crazy about how Arya's acting. She's drastically overreacting to that letter, which the rest of her family didn't take seriously for a second. I mean if she only told Sansa how she got it she'd be able to clearly explain that this is all Littlefinger just trying to stir the pot.

Of all the weak points that are happening lately, this is the most disappointing to me. She was my favourite character, but that's changing rapidly. I'm hoping there's some interesting end-game here.
 
Bullfrog said:
CarltonTheBear said:
I'm really not crazy about how Arya's acting. She's drastically overreacting to that letter, which the rest of her family didn't take seriously for a second. I mean if she only told Sansa how she got it she'd be able to clearly explain that this is all Littlefinger just trying to stir the pot.

Of all the weak points that are happening lately, this is the most disappointing to me. She was my favourite character, but that's changing rapidly. I'm hoping there's some interesting end-game here.

That Chekovalyrian dagger introduced in Act 1 needs to pay off.
 
herman said:
That Chekovalyrian dagger introduced in Act 1 needs to pay off.

I'm starting to think that the show is planning on having Littlefinger come out on on top in this conflict. We all sort of figured that Sansa finally had him beat. And that Arya coming to Winterfell would likely lead to his death. But maybe we had it all wrong, as Littlefinger finally seems to have found a way to outmanoeuvre Sansa. At first he tried to pit her against her family and that failed (at least in the immediate present situation). So instead he pits her family against her. A show like this isn't going to have a happy ending in every single aspect. Not every villain is going to die and not every hero is going to survive.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
herman said:
That Chekovalyrian dagger introduced in Act 1 needs to pay off.

I'm starting to think that the show is planning on having Littlefinger come out on on top in this conflict. We all sort of figured that Sansa finally had him beat. And that Arya coming to Winterfell would likely lead to his death. But maybe we had it all wrong, as Littlefinger finally seems to have found a way to outmanoeuvre Sansa. A show like this isn't going to have a happy ending in every single aspect. Not every villain is going to die and not every hero is going to survive.

I've found that every time the fans come up with awesome theories, the show does the plainest, most obvious thing. And since they're on a callback kick with season 1:

latest


Incoming reversal, methinks.
 
Watching this weeks Talk the Thrones (the Ringer's post-episode analysis show), and while I've only watched these for this season, I've never seen them rip into an episode like this one before.
 
On the Cast of Kings podcast, Joanna Robinson was asked if she still has hope for this show going into season 8.

This is the quote she clings to, assuming that D&D received far more notes about the ending elements that they have bumbled and fumbled towards in Seasons 5 - 7:
Ruling is hard. This was maybe my answer to Tolkien, whom, as much as I admire him, I do quibble with. Lord of the Rings had a very medieval philosophy: that if the king was a good man, the land would prosper. We look at real history and it's not that simple. Tolkien can say that Aragorn became king and reigned for a hundred years, and he was wise and good. But Tolkien doesn't ask the question: What was Aragorn's tax policy? Did he maintain a standing army? What did he do in times of flood and famine? And what about all these orcs? By the end of the war, Sauron is gone but all of the orcs aren't gone ? they're in the mountains. Did Aragorn pursue a policy of systematic genocide and kill them? Even the little baby orcs, in their little orc cradles?

In real life, real-life kings had real-life problems to deal with. Just being a good guy was not the answer. You had to make hard, hard decisions. Sometimes what seemed to be a good decision turned around and bit you in the ass; it was the law of unintended consequences. I've tried to get at some of these in my books. My people who are trying to rule don't have an easy time of it. Just having good intentions doesn't make you a wise king.
From GRRM's interview with Rolling Stones

That above is pretty much what attracted me to the books and the show and is personified in the life of Robert Baratheon: ferocious, inspiring knight; piss-poor ruler.

And to be fair to D&D, they are exceptional adapters of the source material, and really good at executing the vision. Where they've failed now is in creating plausible routes to these new checkpoints beyond the books. The recap that Nik referenced earlier by Alison Herman nails it right in the title: "The Show Is Conventional Fantasy Now".

Judging by D&D's obsession with blowing their direwolf budget on a wight polar bear (clamouring for it since Season 2), we can really see the seams in the show without GRRM's innumerable revisions and dedication to internal logic to fall back on. Season 7 has been less a cohesive story than a series of vignette set pieces where all the effort and money and time went into doing the best explosions.

Take for example the ending of this episode: Viserion becoming a blue-eyed wight dragon. They wanted the eye opening to be the focus to mirror Drogon meeting Jon, and echoing the much earlier scene in the series when we first meet the Night King turning a baby into a White Walker. But with Viserion stuck in the bottom of the lake (a tragically beautiful bit of CGI, btw), the only way they could get that dragon into contact with the Night King was to... suddenly have ship chains North of the Wall and somehow get them around Viserion's neck, and then have thousands of wights with next to zero remaining muscle/tendon drudge it out onto land. Instead of being struck by how much of a game changer the Night King having a dragon is, now I'm stuck on where the hell the chains came from.

Alternative:
- Hardhome homage: NK, standing by the water, raises a hand, crane shot over NK to over the lake (and billows of blood in the water), and two bright blue lights pierce through the murk as the water begins to churn
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top