WhatIfGodWasALeaf
Active member
Nik the Trik said:Patrick said:Good point.
If you're his agent, do you push for the bridge so that he can get to the larger figure sooner?
I honestly don't know. You're potentially talking about a player turning down 20-30 million in guaranteed money by opting for the shorter deal and for players looking to get that first big contract that could be a tough sell.
The other question I think you'd have to ask is that while it might be reasonable to assume that Nylander's first few years will see significant gains in production, there almost certainly is going to be a plateau eventually. Even if we're unified in optimism about Nylander's future prospects there's still a wide gap between him being a 8+ million player and being a 10+ million player.
So, for instance, if the breakdown is this:
ELC
ELC
ELC
6 million
6 million
6 million
6 million
6 million
and the other track is:
ELC
ELC
ELC
4 million
4 million
9 million
9 million
9 million
Then in this situation, the breakdown is 35 million in the second scenario compared to 30 in the first. Would I want to risk injury/whatever over that 5 million? If Nylander is only a 8 million dollar player the difference is only two million, an amount small enough that getting the big contract up front might be more lucrative(especially if you back-dive it as much as the CBA allows).
The thinking though is after the bridge contract the $9M deal is for 6+ years or more. So in terms of guarantees you're getting a larger figure for a shorter-term risk.
That bridge deal would represent a massive risk. Perhaps the agent would go with the 5.5/6M figure post ELC but only if they agree to 3/4 years.