Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nik the Trik said:Also, while it's a minor point, I think Ovechkin would have to get the edge on Stamkos in the contract department right now. The two years left at 7.5 are obviously a bargain for Tampa but after that? Stamkos might very well be the first guy in the league to get a max contract...
Nik the Trik said:Also, while it's a minor point, I think Ovechkin would have to get the edge on Stamkos in the contract department right now. The two years left at 7.5 are obviously a bargain for Tampa but after that? Stamkos might very well be the first guy in the league to get a max contract.
Frank E said:What is a max contract in the NHL these days? Like what % of the cap?
bustaheims said:Frank E said:What is a max contract in the NHL these days? Like what % of the cap?
20% of whatever the cap is at the time the contract is signed.
LuncheonMeat said:Somewhat off topic, I read a post re. zone exits on PPP this morning. It looked at zone exits for forwards over the first 46 games of last season, turnover %, possession, etc. Kessel actually had very good numbers in all categories. Clarkson was battling Orr for the worst numbers - which surprised me as I didn't think he was quite that bad.
Anyway, interesting read FWIW.
http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2014/8/14/5997057/2013-14-first-half-zone-exits-for-leafs-forwards
Potvin29 said:LuncheonMeat said:Somewhat off topic, I read a post re. zone exits on PPP this morning. It looked at zone exits for forwards over the first 46 games of last season, turnover %, possession, etc. Kessel actually had very good numbers in all categories. Clarkson was battling Orr for the worst numbers - which surprised me as I didn't think he was quite that bad.
Anyway, interesting read FWIW.
http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2014/8/14/5997057/2013-14-first-half-zone-exits-for-leafs-forwards
Whatever nerd came up with those numbers needs to watch the games! ;D
LuncheonMeat said:Somewhat off topic, I read a post re. zone exits on PPP this morning. It looked at zone exits for forwards over the first 46 games of last season, turnover %, possession, etc. Kessel actually had very good numbers in all categories. Clarkson was battling Orr for the worst numbers - which surprised me as I didn't think he was quite that bad.
Anyway, interesting read FWIW.
http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2014/8/14/5997057/2013-14-first-half-zone-exits-for-leafs-forwards
Potvin29 said:LuncheonMeat said:Somewhat off topic, I read a post re. zone exits on PPP this morning. It looked at zone exits for forwards over the first 46 games of last season, turnover %, possession, etc. Kessel actually had very good numbers in all categories. Clarkson was battling Orr for the worst numbers - which surprised me as I didn't think he was quite that bad.
Anyway, interesting read FWIW.
http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2014/8/14/5997057/2013-14-first-half-zone-exits-for-leafs-forwards
Here's the companion piece - zone entries: http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2014/8/26/6055497/2013-14-first-half-zone-entries-for-maple-leafs-forwards
Kessel best.
hockeyfan1 said:Potvin29 said:LuncheonMeat said:Somewhat off topic, I read a post re. zone exits on PPP this morning. It looked at zone exits for forwards over the first 46 games of last season, turnover %, possession, etc. Kessel actually had very good numbers in all categories. Clarkson was battling Orr for the worst numbers - which surprised me as I didn't think he was quite that bad.
Anyway, interesting read FWIW.
http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2014/8/14/5997057/2013-14-first-half-zone-exits-for-leafs-forwards
Here's the companion piece - zone entries: http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2014/8/26/6055497/2013-14-first-half-zone-entries-for-maple-leafs-forwards
Kessel best.
Comes to show just how much of a workload Kessel & JVR do for that first line. Bozak, not so much.
From the article:
...your #1 centre has got to be involved in advancing the puck and generating offence, and Tyler Bozak isn't...
his success rate suggests that he does have some skill at zone entries. But whatever the reason for his limited involvement, it's pretty evident that Kessel and JVR are doing the heavy lifting on that line and Bozak is just along for the ride. That's a problem.
Well there is no "1st line center" coming to TO in the near future. So we better get use to it. Kadri is not a "1st line center" either. So we as fans better be happy with a couple of 2nd line centers until management can find one.Chev-boyar-sky said:hockeyfan1 said:Potvin29 said:LuncheonMeat said:Somewhat off topic, I read a post re. zone exits on PPP this morning. It looked at zone exits for forwards over the first 46 games of last season, turnover %, possession, etc. Kessel actually had very good numbers in all categories. Clarkson was battling Orr for the worst numbers - which surprised me as I didn't think he was quite that bad.
Anyway, interesting read FWIW.
http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2014/8/14/5997057/2013-14-first-half-zone-exits-for-leafs-forwards
Here's the companion piece - zone entries: http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2014/8/26/6055497/2013-14-first-half-zone-entries-for-maple-leafs-forwards
Kessel best.
Comes to show just how much of a workload Kessel & JVR do for that first line. Bozak, not so much.
From the article:
...your #1 centre has got to be involved in advancing the puck and generating offence, and Tyler Bozak isn't...
his success rate suggests that he does have some skill at zone entries. But whatever the reason for his limited involvement, it's pretty evident that Kessel and JVR are doing the heavy lifting on that line and Bozak is just along for the ride. That's a problem.
I'm no stats guy but somehow that doesn't really surprise me.
Kessel and JVR are the most talented guys on the line. Seems to me they both are better carriers of the puck too (puck-handling/stick-handling what have you).
Now I do agree that Bozak isn't a #1C that I'd expect to win the Cup with ("That's a problem") but I don't think I need advanced stats to know that.
Potvin29 said:LuncheonMeat said:Somewhat off topic, I read a post re. zone exits on PPP this morning. It looked at zone exits for forwards over the first 46 games of last season, turnover %, possession, etc. Kessel actually had very good numbers in all categories. Clarkson was battling Orr for the worst numbers - which surprised me as I didn't think he was quite that bad.
Anyway, interesting read FWIW.
http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2014/8/14/5997057/2013-14-first-half-zone-exits-for-leafs-forwards
Here's the companion piece - zone entries: http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2014/8/26/6055497/2013-14-first-half-zone-entries-for-maple-leafs-forwards
Kessel best.
freer said:Well there is no "1st line center" coming to TO in the near future. So we better get use to it. Kadri is not a "1st line center" either. So we as fans better be happy with a couple of 2nd line centers until management can find one.
Bullfrog said:I'm with you BWB. I think we're going to see continued progression from Kadri. It wouldn't shock me to see him flirt with 70+ points this season.
Bullfrog said:I'm with you BWB. I think we're going to see continued progression from Kadri. It wouldn't shock me to see him flirt with 70+ points this season.
CarltonTheBear said:Bullfrog said:I'm with you BWB. I think we're going to see continued progression from Kadri. It wouldn't shock me to see him flirt with 70+ points this season.
I think that could happen, but he'll need to get top unit PP time on a regular basis.
Potvin29 said:Bullfrog said:I'm with you BWB. I think we're going to see continued progression from Kadri. It wouldn't shock me to see him flirt with 70+ points this season.
I think that's pretty much impossible unless they make him the 1st line C. Bozak averaged over 2:00 more ice time per game at even-strength than Kadri last season and ~:20 more PP time per game. I just don't think he'd get enough ice-time with the necessary linemates to put up those kinds of numbers if he remains in the position he was in last season.
He really deserves to be the #1 C on the PP at least though, but I could understand why they might want to spread the offense out between the two units like they have.