L K
Active member
Guilt Trip said:Because you get a replacement for Kerfoot if they go that way. If Seattle takes McCann the Leafs essentially get to keep their roster and only lose Hallander and a 7th. It's a pretty smart move by Dubas.L K said:Ok Unless Seattle said they want Dermott or Kerfoot and plan to take them already. Why trade for McCann and potentially lose assets
Maybe the money doesn?t play out I think I had just been interested in keeping both Kerfoot and McCann. I?m nonplussed about losing Holl/Dermott at this point.
Although I guess it is better to look at it as Seattle picking Hallander and a 7th if they take McCann and that would be a good loss from the Leafs perspective