Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
6. Another name I?ve heard [in potential trade talks]: Nashville?s Viktor Arvidsson. Tough, hard-working player. Three years left at $4.25 million.
10. I think New Jersey would consider moving the fourth-overall selection for a good, young defenceman.
I'd rather have Granlund for less money then both of them.herman said:https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/31-thoughts-blackhawks-must-publicly-address-sexual-assault-allegations/
6. Another name I?ve heard [in potential trade talks]: Nashville?s Viktor Arvidsson. Tough, hard-working player. Three years left at $4.25 million.
10. I think New Jersey would consider moving the fourth-overall selection for a good, young defenceman.
I would also not be opposed to replacing Hyman with Arvidsson.
LeBrun: I will freely admit that when the Maple Leafs? season ended, I thought Frederik Andersen was most definitely headed to the free-agent market.
It just felt to me like his time in Toronto had come to an end. The emergence of Jack Campbell plus perhaps some hurt feelings from Andersen as far as the perception of his value in the Leafs? market gave me the distinct impression he was gone.
And he may still be come July 28, of course.
But Claude Lemieux, the agent for the pending UFA netminder, told me Tuesday that Leafs management has reached out recently to ask if Andersen had interest in returning.
And the answer from Lemieux to the Leafs was yes.
Now, having mutual interest is one thing; converting that into a contract that satisfies both sides within the Leafs? salary cap situation, well, that?s another thing.
But it is nevertheless revealing that the conversation happened and that Lemieux told the Leafs that Andersen is absolutely comfortable coming back and sharing the net with Campbell.
Arn said:"Mutual interest" between the Leafs and Andersen for a new deal for Freddie.
The Leafs priority this off season isn't Hyman, it's getting a 1A goalie. Jack's not a 1A but I would look to extend him this off season. He's a good back up plan and he should be good for 30-35 games.L K said:I don't have a problem bringing him back but it really needs to be in the 2-3 million territory if he wants to do it but it has to be in that range. That's the kind of contract that gives the flexibility for the Leafs to make improvements to the rest of the roster.
Another note...do you try and come up with an extension for Jack Campbell in the offseason to try and negotiate his salary down in case he has another good year this coming season or do you wait and not trust a partial season with a guy who has had some injury issues? To me he is the 1A guy going into next season and you do need a 1B there with him but it would be a shame to be stuck in a situation where we have to have tough lineup decisions just to keep our goalie past next year if he has another good year.
I would consider it at that money for sure. Don't forget he's good on shootouts too.CarltonTheBear said:Here's a maybe crazy idea that I don't think I would have really considered a couple of years ago: should we bring Bozak back?
He's scored at a 40-point pace over his 3 seasons as a Blue and continued his face-off success at 55%. That's not that surprising but what is is that he's become a pretty consistent member of their PK as well. In his 1st season there he averaged 1:16 on the PK, 2nd season 1:24, and in his 3rd 1:57. Lord knows we could use another centre on the penalty kill. His 5-on-5 defensive numbers also look better than they did as a Leaf.
He's not coming off his best season and he missed some time with an injury though. He's also a mind-boggling 35 years old now. Partially because of those things Evolving Hockey is only projecting a $1.3mil contract for him this offseason. That feels a bit low but even if it's something in that 2's that seems like a pretty fair deal for a 3C who can PP and PK and who already has connections with the team. Would be at least something I'd strongly consider, especially since it'd mean we could invest more money at the wing position.
Well if you can get him at 2 and Bozak at 1.xx low Foligno can stay on the wing. Then they can get Bunting and trade for Garland. That would make me happy lol.Frank E said:I thought we were re-signing Foligno to a super cheap deal because he feels bad for getting hurt?
Frank E said:I thought we were re-signing Foligno to a super cheap deal because he feels bad for getting hurt?
That would be great IMO. I want the Leafs to get Garland and Bunting. The more I think about it, Bozak would be an ideal 3rd line centre.CarltonTheBear said:Frank E said:I thought we were re-signing Foligno to a super cheap deal because he feels bad for getting hurt?
Nylander-Matthews-Garland
Foligno-Tavares-Marner
Mikheyev-Bozak-Bunting
Galchenyuk-Spezza-Simmonds
Rielly-Brodie
Muzzin-Holl
Sandin-Liljegren
Hutton
Campbell
Andersen/other $3.5mil goalie
Foligno @ $2.5mil, Bozak $2mil, Garland @ $4.5mil, Galchenyuk/Bunting/Hutton $900k
herman said:Oh hey, Josh Ho-Sang is UFA now... I'd Vesey/Galchenyuk that.
I really don't understand his appeal after showing very little.CarltonTheBear said:herman said:Oh hey, Josh Ho-Sang is UFA now... I'd Vesey/Galchenyuk that.
I mean I wouldn't be opposed to signing him but he'd definitely be playing in the AHL.