Champ Kind said:
Al14 said:
bustaheims said:
Champ Kind said:
Argue his contract all you want, but this statement is absurd.
That all depends on the talent cost to acquire him. It's likely the cost to acquire would mean that acquiring Nash wouldn't help the Leafs be a better team on the ice than they are right now.
Exactly my point!
That's entirely true, and I agree with both of your statements. But Al14's first statement was "I don't think he'll be able to help the Leafs on the ice all that much". That's what I disagree with. Adding a player of Nash's calibre can't help but improve the team, notwithstanding what might have to be subtracted to acquire him.
Rick Nash is a very good piece to add to any hockey team, however, the many pieces you may have to give up conteracts the benefits that Nash brings.
If we could just sign him without losing any assets, that would make all the difference.
At this point, I don't think the Leafs are a deep enough of a team to get Nash and be all that more competative with him. No disrespect to Nash intended! Just MHO.