• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

The Official TFC/Soccer thread

Madferret said:
http://tsn.ca/soccer/story/?id=383193

What a disgrace. Go play in Italy Suarez you'll fit right in.

Or Holland.

The only country where a national cultural holiday figure can be a slave child, and they don't see anything racist about it.
 
It's interesting in that one black man accused another black man of using a racial slur against him, particularly the point of being black.  Not really sure that the FA is actually on any moral high ground here.  That said I don't know how generalizing Italians and Dutch in the previous comments as being racists really helps enlighten the situation.
 
JohnK's Revenge said:
It's interesting in that one black man accused another black man of using a racial slur against him, particularly the point of being black.  Not really sure that the FA is actually on any moral high ground here.  That said I don't know how generalizing Italians and Dutch in the previous comments as being racists really helps enlighten the situation.

Schwartz Pete is a very racist character which is widely beloved in Holland.

Not sure it's a generalization to say that it's racist for it to be openly accepted.
 
Chev-boyar-sky said:
Madferret said:
http://tsn.ca/soccer/story/?id=383193

What a disgrace. Go play in Italy Suarez you'll fit right in.

Or Holland.

The only country where a national cultural holiday figure can be a slave child, and they don't see anything racist about it.

He didn't like the "cuisine" in Holland anymore.

:D
 
Chev-boyar-sky said:
JohnK's Revenge said:
It's interesting in that one black man accused another black man of using a racial slur against him, particularly the point of being black.  Not really sure that the FA is actually on any moral high ground here.  That said I don't know how generalizing Italians and Dutch in the previous comments as being racists really helps enlighten the situation.

Schwartz Pete is a very racist character which is widely beloved in Holland.

Not sure it's a generalization to say that it's racist for it to be openly accepted.
I had a gollywog when I was 5 yrs old.  I would buy my own kid one except for the fear of him being deemed a racist.  Don't know much about Black Peter but it doesn't appear that saint nick went to africa and slapped him in irons.  More of a Batman & Robin figure in dutch christmas folklore but I can see it a Talisman that can be twisted to either side of the debate "Traditionalists" vs "Anti-Racists".  I wonder what Ritz will call their products a hundred years from now as it's clearly racially motivated (TFPIC).
 
JohnK's Revenge said:
Chev-boyar-sky said:
JohnK's Revenge said:
It's interesting in that one black man accused another black man of using a racial slur against him, particularly the point of being black.  Not really sure that the FA is actually on any moral high ground here.  That said I don't know how generalizing Italians and Dutch in the previous comments as being racists really helps enlighten the situation.

Schwartz Pete is a very racist character which is widely beloved in Holland.

Not sure it's a generalization to say that it's racist for it to be openly accepted.
I had a gollywog when I was 5 yrs old.  I would buy my own kid one except for the fear of him being deemed a racist.  Don't know much about Black Peter but it doesn't appear that saint nick went to africa and slapped him in irons.  More of a Batman & Robin figure in dutch christmas folklore but I can see it a Talisman that can be twisted to either side of the debate "Traditionalists" vs "Anti-Racists".  I wonder what Ritz will call their products a hundred years from now as it's clearly racially motivated (TFPIC).

Well the true origins from the Middle Ages were that Schwartz Piet was evil.

In colonial Holland he became a mischievous black child which Sinterklaas brought back from a colony. He's often used in children's games where he answers all questions wrong appearing ignorant so other children can get the questions right. Historically he's spoken Dutch with a bad accent and been laughed at and ridiculed for it.

It is very common for white Dutch people to don "black face" in order to be Schwartz Piet. You may not think it's racist but at the very least it's massively insensitive, not unlike the Gollywog doll you mentioned. For it to be so openly accepted is also very disconcerting, IMO. Just because you grew up with something and didn't think it was racist, doesn't mean others had the same opinion. Would you be ok with a "Jewish doll" that was portrayed with a big nose? 

Here's a link to an article discussing the issue with a picture that speaks for itself:

http://www.thegrio.com/news/black-peter-racist-dutch-xmas-tradition-or-not.php
 
Chev-boyar-sky said:
JohnK's Revenge said:
Chev-boyar-sky said:
JohnK's Revenge said:
It's interesting in that one black man accused another black man of using a racial slur against him, particularly the point of being black.  Not really sure that the FA is actually on any moral high ground here.  That said I don't know how generalizing Italians and Dutch in the previous comments as being racists really helps enlighten the situation.

Schwartz Pete is a very racist character which is widely beloved in Holland.

Not sure it's a generalization to say that it's racist for it to be openly accepted.
I had a gollywog when I was 5 yrs old.  I would buy my own kid one except for the fear of him being deemed a racist.  Don't know much about Black Peter but it doesn't appear that saint nick went to africa and slapped him in irons.  More of a Batman & Robin figure in dutch christmas folklore but I can see it a Talisman that can be twisted to either side of the debate "Traditionalists" vs "Anti-Racists".  I wonder what Ritz will call their products a hundred years from now as it's clearly racially motivated (TFPIC).

Well the true origins from the Middle Ages were that Schwartz Piet was evil.

In colonial Holland he became a mischievous black child which Sinterklaas brought back from a colony. He's often used in children's games where he answers all questions wrong appearing ignorant so other children can get the questions right. Historically he's spoken Dutch with a bad accent and been laughed at and ridiculed for it.

It is very common for white Dutch people to don "black face" in order to be Schwartz Piet. You may not think it's racist but at the very least it's massively insensitive, not unlike the Gollywog doll you mentioned. For it to be so openly accepted is also very disconcerting, IMO. Just because you grew up with something and didn't think it was racist, doesn't mean others had the same opinion. Would you be ok with a "Jewish doll" that was portrayed with a big nose? 

Here's a link to an article discussing the issue with a picture that speaks for itself:

http://www.thegrio.com/news/black-peter-racist-dutch-xmas-tradition-or-not.php

What about wearing a Washington Redskins or Atlanta Braves jersey - First Nations people have long voiced their displeasure with both names / images.
 
Chev-boyar-sky said:
It is very common for white Dutch people to don "black face" in order to be Schwartz Piet. You may not think it's racist but at the very least it's massively insensitive, not unlike the Gollywog doll you mentioned. For it to be so openly accepted is also very disconcerting, IMO. Just because you grew up with something and didn't think it was racist, doesn't mean others had the same opinion. Would you be ok with a "Jewish doll" that was portrayed with a big nose? 
The point I am making is that if I had a doll with a big nose, and someone comes along and says that it's a Jewish doll doesn't mean that it is a Jewish doll or that I am racist. Even the article you cited stated that Black Pete was not considered to be a black man but a soot covered boy who can't wash it out.  And anyone who had an issue with my gollywog, well i guess that's their cross to bear.

Anyway Black Pete is way off topic and I can't debate it beyond the superficial level.  I think a more interesting point to discuss is whether John Terry will get anything close to what FA gave Suarez.  You know black guy gets 8 game suspension and white guy gets off on lack proof. ::)
 
JohnK's Revenge said:
Chev-boyar-sky said:
It is very common for white Dutch people to don "black face" in order to be Schwartz Piet. You may not think it's racist but at the very least it's massively insensitive, not unlike the Gollywog doll you mentioned. For it to be so openly accepted is also very disconcerting, IMO. Just because you grew up with something and didn't think it was racist, doesn't mean others had the same opinion. Would you be ok with a "Jewish doll" that was portrayed with a big nose? 
The point I am making is that if I had a doll with a big nose, and someone comes along and says that it's a Jewish doll doesn't mean that it is a Jewish doll or that I am racist. Even the article you cited stated that Black Pete was not considered to be a black man but a soot covered boy who can't wash it out.  And anyone who had an issue with my gollywog, well i guess that's their cross to bear.

Anyway Black Pete is way off topic and I can't debate it beyond the superficial level.  I think a more interesting point to discuss is whether John Terry will get anything close to what FA gave Suarez.  You know black guy gets 8 game suspension and white guy gets off on lack proof. ::)

Chev likes to bring that story up anytime I take a shot at Italian footballers / Serie A - I think he thinks I'm dutch or something.
 
Madferret said:
What about wearing a Washington Redskins or Atlanta Braves jersey - First Nations people have long voiced their displeasure with both names / images.
This topic, of how icons are changeing based on public opinion is fascinating to me. And it should probably be moved to another thread.  Your point is well taken.  What should we do.  When those names were created for those teams I believe they were created with the utmost respect intended.  Almost all sporting teams are considered a metaphor for warring armies.  The native armies were always feared for their fighting spirit (especially since they fighting guns with bows and arrows)  Their bravery was unquestion.  Another icon i've thought about was the swastika.  It conjures up such derision when we see it today but I was shocked to find it in a book of art from ancient times as a symbol of strength and it was usually well regarded.  Christmas is the kicker though....  after fighting off people to satisfy my guilt of not consuming "enough" ...  I go home to watch some crap about Christ's birth....  when I really should be going off to some burial mound or cemetary to pay respects to the dead on the solstice.
 
Am I missing something? JohnK keeps referring to Suarez as black but he seems hispanic to me.
 
Back
Top