• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

2019 Toronto Maple Leafs Offseason Discussion

Who will captain the Toronto Maple Leafs in 2019?

  • William Nylander

    Votes: 20 60.6%
  • John Tavares

    Votes: 3 9.1%
  • Morgan Rielly

    Votes: 6 18.2%
  • Mitch Marner

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No one

    Votes: 4 12.1%

  • Total voters
    33
A doctor's note would suffice but I doubt he goes along with that. I would bet money he will be on cap next season. No one wants him, he has NMC too.
 
Marleau wants to play next season, so he's not going anywhere. Even on the off-chance he'd accept a trade back to San Jose they won't have the cap space even at a 50% discount.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Marleau wants to play next season, so he's not going anywhere. Even on the off-chance he'd accept a trade back to San Jose they won't have the cap space even at a 50% discount.

Why do you need to bring down my Friday, hrmph.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Marleau wants to play next season, so he's not going anywhere. Even on the off-chance he'd accept a trade back to San Jose they won't have the cap space even at a 50% discount.
What are the rules about a buyout in this situation? Say the Leafs pay his signing bonus on July 1st, then trade him to Ottawa or whoever needs to get to the cap floor. They buy out the remaining small salary but take the cap hit. Marleau is then a UFA and signs a one year $1 million contract with San Jose or Toronto or whoever.

I know the league would be looking at the situation closely after Orpik last year, but is it possible?
 
Crake said:
What are the rules about a buyout in this situation? Say the Leafs pay his signing bonus on July 1st, then trade him to Ottawa or whoever needs to get to the cap floor. They buy out the remaining small salary but take the cap hit. Marleau is then a UFA and signs a one year $1 million contract with San Jose or Toronto or whoever.

I know the league would be looking at the situation closely after Orpik last year, but is it possible?

The buyout window closes on June 30th though, so if the Leafs did something like this then they would need to trade Marleau to a team before that date and that team would need to eat his July 1st signing bonus in their buyout. So it's possible, but it's a lot more pricey than if the Leafs were able to eat the buyout.

There is a second buyout window that opens after July 1st for teams with arbitration filings but only players on a teams reserve list as of the trade deadline are eligible to be bought out during that, so that wouldn't help in this situation.
 
I'd also say that just because Washington got away with blatant cap circumvention doesn't mean we will. For all we know the league warned everyone afterward that that wouldn't fly going forward.
 
Crake said:
What are the rules about a buyout in this situation? Say the Leafs pay his signing bonus on July 1st, then trade him to Ottawa or whoever needs to get to the cap floor. They buy out the remaining small salary but take the cap hit. Marleau is then a UFA and signs a one year $1 million contract with San Jose or Toronto or whoever.

I know the league would be looking at the situation closely after Orpik last year, but is it possible?

A buyout would save the team some money on the base salary (roughly $417K total savings, but the also spreads the payout for the remaining ~$833K over two years - so, spend less this season, but spend more next, though, again, not in meaningful amounts), but won't impact the cap at all - so, as CtB points out, with the timing of the window, and the fact the team would still have to carry the full weight of the cap hit, it probably has a negative impact on the trade from the Leafs' perspective. It's better for Marleau, but it doesn't help any of the teams involved in the trade in a meaningful way.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
I'd also say that just because Washington got away with blatant cap circumvention doesn't mean we will. For all we know the league warned everyone afterward that that wouldn't fly going forward.

Yup. It would basically guarantee Marleau doesn't play for the Leafs next season - which, I'm fully on board with. The options here are really keep Marleau at his full cap hit, or not have Marleau on the roster.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Crake said:
What are the rules about a buyout in this situation? Say the Leafs pay his signing bonus on July 1st, then trade him to Ottawa or whoever needs to get to the cap floor. They buy out the remaining small salary but take the cap hit. Marleau is then a UFA and signs a one year $1 million contract with San Jose or Toronto or whoever.

I know the league would be looking at the situation closely after Orpik last year, but is it possible?

The buyout window closes on June 30th though, so if the Leafs did something like this then they would need to trade Marleau to a team before that date and that team would need to eat his July 1st signing bonus in their buyout. So it's possible, but it's a lot more pricey than if the Leafs were able to eat the buyout.

There is a second buyout window that opens after July 1st for teams with arbitration filings but only players on a teams reserve list as of the trade deadline are eligible to be bought out during that, so that wouldn't help in this situation.
Ah, I didn't realize the second buyout window had the reserve list restriction. That puts a damper on the trade and buyout option as teams like Ottawa would want a big premium to take him before the July 1st bonus is paid.
 
bustaheims said:
CarltonTheBear said:
I'd also say that just because Washington got away with blatant cap circumvention doesn't mean we will. For all we know the league warned everyone afterward that that wouldn't fly going forward.

Yup. It would basically guarantee Marleau doesn't play for the Leafs next season - which, I'm fully on board with. The options here are really keep Marleau at his full cap hit, or not have Marleau on the roster.

The Marleau/Zaitsev deals really put the Leafs in cap hell for next year considering what they bring right now could be had for... what, $5M?
 
Bender said:
The Marleau/Zaitsev deals really put the Leafs in cap hell for next year considering what they bring right now could be had for... what, $5M?

That could be about what they'd get on the open market right now, but I'd even argue they could be effectively replaced with guys on ELCs/sub-$1mil cap hits.
 
I'm generally fine with whatever pans out. It's cap hell for a year and then we move on. Should still be a playoff team with the progression of the big-3 + Tavares. It opens up possibilities for some Marlies to come up, including a full-time promotion for Moore and probably Rosen.

There will probably be some cheap FA signings as well. (though the Russian/Finn signings might already be that.)
 
Bullfrog said:
I'm generally fine with whatever pans out. It's cap hell for a year and then we move on. Should still be a playoff team with the progression of the big-3 + Tavares. It opens up possibilities for some Marlies to come up, including a full-time promotion for Moore and probably Rosen.

There will probably be some cheap FA signings as well. (though the Russian/Finn signings might already be that.)

There's a lot of doom and gloom but Nylander going from half a season of 3rd line production to a full season of even 17/18-Nylander production would be a huge boost for the team. And if he takes another step forward like we all think he can then that'll be even better.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Bullfrog said:
I'm generally fine with whatever pans out. It's cap hell for a year and then we move on. Should still be a playoff team with the progression of the big-3 + Tavares. It opens up possibilities for some Marlies to come up, including a full-time promotion for Moore and probably Rosen.

There will probably be some cheap FA signings as well. (though the Russian/Finn signings might already be that.)

There's a lot of doom and gloom but Nylander going from half a season of 3rd line production to a full season of even 17/18-Nylander production would be a huge boost for the team. And if he takes another step forward like we all think he can then that'll be even better.

I haven't been keeping up to date, but does anyone think they can bring Kadri back next season?

Because I sure don't.
 
Frank E said:
I haven't been keeping up to date, but does anyone think they can bring Kadri back next season?

Because I sure don't.

I think they can. Obviously, his playoff blow-ups are no good, but, they don't have enough depth down the middle to move on from him so easily.
 
Frank E said:
CarltonTheBear said:
Bullfrog said:
I'm generally fine with whatever pans out. It's cap hell for a year and then we move on. Should still be a playoff team with the progression of the big-3 + Tavares. It opens up possibilities for some Marlies to come up, including a full-time promotion for Moore and probably Rosen.

There will probably be some cheap FA signings as well. (though the Russian/Finn signings might already be that.)

There's a lot of doom and gloom but Nylander going from half a season of 3rd line production to a full season of even 17/18-Nylander production would be a huge boost for the team. And if he takes another step forward like we all think he can then that'll be even better.

I haven't been keeping up to date, but does anyone think they can bring Kadri back next season?

Because I sure don't.

I think Johnsson or Kapanen will be gone before him.
 
I had a weird dream where Marleau got traded for Kessel, and the line of Nylander - Kadri - Kessel put up 96 goals.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top