Heroic Shrimp
Active member
I think we can all agree it?s time to plan the parade? of people falsely claiming that Leaf fans are planning the parade.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At the same time he's saved way above expected thus far.bustaheims said:Joe S. said:I?m not taking anything away from Campbell but it?s not like we?re watching cujo and Belfour bailing the team out.
He?s been steady and reliable but has he stood in his head and bailed them out of games they shouldn?t have been in? I?d argue that no he hasn?t.
Agreed. He?s had some great games and some excellent sequences, but the team in front of him has been equally good. They?ve done a pretty good job of limiting the grade A chances, haven?t spent many long stretches hemmed in their zone, etc. The team has helped make Campbell look good just as much as he?s made the team look good. They?ve been putting together really complete performances.
Significantly Insignificant said:Think the Leafs have any interest in DeBrusk?
Frank E said:Significantly Insignificant said:Think the Leafs have any interest in DeBrusk?
I don't think Boston would ever consider trading him in division.
L K said:Frank E said:Significantly Insignificant said:Think the Leafs have any interest in DeBrusk?
I don't think Boston would ever consider trading him in division.
We also don't have the cap space to absorb a 3.675M cap hit on a guy you are acquiring to hope his scoring form returns. The Bruins aren't going to trade him 1 for 1 for Ritchie.
Debrusk for Mikheyev and Holl???? Sorry but that's ridiculous. I wouldn't trade Mikheyev straight up for him.Significantly Insignificant said:L K said:Frank E said:Significantly Insignificant said:Think the Leafs have any interest in DeBrusk?
I don't think Boston would ever consider trading him in division.
We also don't have the cap space to absorb a 3.675M cap hit on a guy you are acquiring to hope his scoring form returns. The Bruins aren't going to trade him 1 for 1 for Ritchie.
Yeah, Boston probably won't trade him to a team in the same division. I was thinking you could make the deal work if Mikheyev and Holl were going back the other way.
L K said:We also don't have the cap space to absorb a 3.675M cap hit on a guy you are acquiring to hope his scoring form returns. The Bruins aren't going to trade him 1 for 1 for Ritchie.
Guilt Trip said:Debrusk for Mikheyev and Holl???? Sorry but that's ridiculous. I wouldn't trade Mikheyev straight up for him.Significantly Insignificant said:L K said:Frank E said:Significantly Insignificant said:Think the Leafs have any interest in DeBrusk?
I don't think Boston would ever consider trading him in division.
We also don't have the cap space to absorb a 3.675M cap hit on a guy you are acquiring to hope his scoring form returns. The Bruins aren't going to trade him 1 for 1 for Ritchie.
Yeah, Boston probably won't trade him to a team in the same division. I was thinking you could make the deal work if Mikheyev and Holl were going back the other way.
herman said:https://twitter.com/jim03bjays/status/1465525240788828171
Significantly Insignificant said:Guilt Trip said:Debrusk for Mikheyev and Holl???? Sorry but that's ridiculous. I wouldn't trade Mikheyev straight up for him.Significantly Insignificant said:L K said:Frank E said:Significantly Insignificant said:Think the Leafs have any interest in DeBrusk?
I don't think Boston would ever consider trading him in division.
We also don't have the cap space to absorb a 3.675M cap hit on a guy you are acquiring to hope his scoring form returns. The Bruins aren't going to trade him 1 for 1 for Ritchie.
Yeah, Boston probably won't trade him to a team in the same division. I was thinking you could make the deal work if Mikheyev and Holl were going back the other way.
Forgive me, but I don't get the incredulous tone in this post. Holl is the reason the Leafs are going to have to send Liljegren down when Mrazek comes off IR, and quite frankly, I think he has been the Leaf's worst d-man this season. Mikheyev requested a trade from this team, and it probably means that in order to placate him they are going to have to play him on a line with Tavares, and I am not really sure how that is going to work out. It may be fine if he can produce there, but rather than his quick start in his rookie season, he hasn't really lit the world on fire since, despite being given some chances last year to play with Tavares. Also, in the playoffs, Mikheyev has a grand total of 0 points.
DeBrusk is a different player, and he is a reclamation project, but he also plays a style that could be useful in the playoffs, and his style of game may be more of a fit on the Tavares line than Mikhayev's will be.
You don't know how Mikheyev will work out with JT but let's get rid of a top 4 guy,(that's where he plays), in Holl and Mikheyev for a reclamation project? Keefe will not placate Mikheyev. He will get his shot in the top 6 and if it doesn't work he'll go to the third line. You seem to forget how good this guy is defensively and before you start with the offence again let me remind you that this guy has outproduced Hyman, in their first 90+ NHL games and never had a sniff of PP time or played with Matthews. Last season he scored 2 less goals and 9 less points then Hyman 5v5 and again, never played with M&M. Oh and Hyman had 1 playoff point last year playing exclusively on the PP and with M&M. He's also better defensively.Significantly Insignificant said:Guilt Trip said:Debrusk for Mikheyev and Holl???? Sorry but that's ridiculous. I wouldn't trade Mikheyev straight up for him.Significantly Insignificant said:L K said:Frank E said:Significantly Insignificant said:Think the Leafs have any interest in DeBrusk?
I don't think Boston would ever consider trading him in division.
We also don't have the cap space to absorb a 3.675M cap hit on a guy you are acquiring to hope his scoring form returns. The Bruins aren't going to trade him 1 for 1 for Ritchie.
Yeah, Boston probably won't trade him to a team in the same division. I was thinking you could make the deal work if Mikheyev and Holl were going back the other way.
Forgive me, but I don't get the incredulous tone in this post. Holl is the reason the Leafs are going to have to send Liljegren down when Mrazek comes off IR, and quite frankly, I think he has been the Leaf's worst d-man this season. Mikheyev requested a trade from this team, and it probably means that in order to placate him they are going to have to play him on a line with Tavares, and I am not really sure how that is going to work out. It may be fine if he can produce there, but rather than his quick start in his rookie season, he hasn't really lit the world on fire since, despite being given some chances last year to play with Tavares. Also, in the playoffs, Mikheyev has a grand total of 0 points.
DeBrusk is a different player, and he is a reclamation project, but he also plays a style that could be useful in the playoffs, and his style of game may be more of a fit on the Tavares line than Mikhayev's will be.
Guilt Trip said:You don't know how Mikheyev will work out with JT but let's get rid of a top 4 guy,(that's where he plays), in Holl and Mikheyev for a reclamation project? Keefe will not placate Mikheyev. He will get his shot in the top 6 and if it doesn't work he'll go to the third line. You seem to forget how good this guy is defensively and before you start with the offence again let me remind you that this guy has outproduced Hyman, in their first 90+ NHL games and never had a sniff of PP time or played with Matthews. Last season he scored 2 less goals and 9 less points then Hyman 5v5 and again, never played with M&M. Oh and Hyman had 1 playoff point last year playing exclusively on the PP and with M&M. He's also better defensively.Significantly Insignificant said:Guilt Trip said:Debrusk for Mikheyev and Holl???? Sorry but that's ridiculous. I wouldn't trade Mikheyev straight up for him.Significantly Insignificant said:L K said:Frank E said:Significantly Insignificant said:Think the Leafs have any interest in DeBrusk?
I don't think Boston would ever consider trading him in division.
We also don't have the cap space to absorb a 3.675M cap hit on a guy you are acquiring to hope his scoring form returns. The Bruins aren't going to trade him 1 for 1 for Ritchie.
Yeah, Boston probably won't trade him to a team in the same division. I was thinking you could make the deal work if Mikheyev and Holl were going back the other way.
Forgive me, but I don't get the incredulous tone in this post. Holl is the reason the Leafs are going to have to send Liljegren down when Mrazek comes off IR, and quite frankly, I think he has been the Leaf's worst d-man this season. Mikheyev requested a trade from this team, and it probably means that in order to placate him they are going to have to play him on a line with Tavares, and I am not really sure how that is going to work out. It may be fine if he can produce there, but rather than his quick start in his rookie season, he hasn't really lit the world on fire since, despite being given some chances last year to play with Tavares. Also, in the playoffs, Mikheyev has a grand total of 0 points.
DeBrusk is a different player, and he is a reclamation project, but he also plays a style that could be useful in the playoffs, and his style of game may be more of a fit on the Tavares line than Mikhayev's will be.
Mikheyev is flat out a better player then Debrusk and makes roughly 2 mill less.
If the Leafs don't want Liljegren to go down to the Marlies, they could trade Holl or Dermott or whoever, but bringing back a crappy contract and player like Debrusk for players that are better would be a mistake.
Morgan Rielly had long believed no other NHL organization could treat him as well as the Leafs since he was drafted fifth in 2012. Yet if there was something that made him realize he wanted to wrap up his contract extension, it might have been a series of conversations this summer.
Rielly alluded to as much when his extension was announced, telling reporters that as he?s gotten older, ?you start to feel passionately about your job.?
Over the summer, the wisecracks about the Leafs came fast and hard from friends, exacerbated by the Leafs? blown 3-1 series lead over the Montreal Canadiens in the first round of the 2021 NHL playoffs.
Being the longest-serving current Leaf means these comments are nothing new. But this time, they struck a nerve with the normally even-keeled Rielly.
?I found myself getting really defensive about my teammates and Toronto,? Rielly said. ?And I think that?s when it really clicked that this team means a lot to me, and this game means a lot to me. It?s arguably the most important thing to me.?
herman said:https://theathletic.com/2986359/2021/12/01/one-on-one-with-morgan-rielly-how-off-ice-lessons-changed-the-leafs-defenceman-and-kept-him-in-toronto-long-term/
Morgan Rielly had long believed no other NHL organization could treat him as well as the Leafs since he was drafted fifth in 2012. Yet if there was something that made him realize he wanted to wrap up his contract extension, it might have been a series of conversations this summer.
Rielly alluded to as much when his extension was announced, telling reporters that as he?s gotten older, ?you start to feel passionately about your job.?
Over the summer, the wisecracks about the Leafs came fast and hard from friends, exacerbated by the Leafs? blown 3-1 series lead over the Montreal Canadiens in the first round of the 2021 NHL playoffs.
Being the longest-serving current Leaf means these comments are nothing new. But this time, they struck a nerve with the normally even-keeled Rielly.
?I found myself getting really defensive about my teammates and Toronto,? Rielly said. ?And I think that?s when it really clicked that this team means a lot to me, and this game means a lot to me. It?s arguably the most important thing to me.?
Nik said:"Arguably" the most important thing to him? What sort of lack of commitment is that? Does he have some sort of family or personal life he values? NOT 100% MROGAN!