OldTimeHockey
Active member
Eichel
[/quote]
That's the one everyone's going to talk about. Not sure how they'd ever make that happen.
[/quote]
That's the one everyone's going to talk about. Not sure how they'd ever make that happen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eichel is the only one that would get me excited that I can think of but it's going to cost you Marner. Not sure how Id feel about trading him..OldTimeHockey said:That's the one everyone's going to talk about. Not sure how they'd ever make that happen.
Guilt Trip said:That's the only one that would get me excited but it's going to cost you Marner. Not sure how Id feel about trading him..
Nik said:As much as I like Marner, I don't understand for the life of me why Buffalo would do that deal. If I'm Buffalo, I'd rather trade Eichel for the proverbial two quarters a dime and a nickel because at least then you can sell the fans that you're tearing down the team and trying to build back up. If you trade Eichel for Marner you're basically saying you're going to try to do the same thing you've been doing, only built around someone who isn't as good as Eichel and is more expensive.
CarltonTheBear said:I agree with you that would probably be the smarter thing for Buffalo to do, but it's not like the Sabres have a long history of making the right decisions. Selling fans on another rebuild after 10 straight years of missing the playoffs would be pretty tough, and I can see ownership being tempted to solve this Eichel problem by replacing him with another young, legit top tier talent in the league. And if they go that route then I don't think they're going to find anyone available even nearly as good as Marner (if Mitch was available, which he probably isn't). They also might not mind the slightly higher AAV since it also comes at a drastically reduced salary (Eichel gets paid $10mil in each of his next 5 years, while Marner gets paid just $24.8mil total in the next 4 years if the Leafs take his next signing bonus).
Nik said:CarltonTheBear said:I agree with you that would probably be the smarter thing for Buffalo to do, but it's not like the Sabres have a long history of making the right decisions. Selling fans on another rebuild after 10 straight years of missing the playoffs would be pretty tough, and I can see ownership being tempted to solve this Eichel problem by replacing him with another young, legit top tier talent in the league. And if they go that route then I don't think they're going to find anyone available even nearly as good as Marner (if Mitch was available, which he probably isn't). They also might not mind the slightly higher AAV since it also comes at a drastically reduced salary (Eichel gets paid $10mil in each of his next 5 years, while Marner gets paid just $24.8mil total in the next 4 years if the Leafs take his next signing bonus).
Your point about the real dollars owed is well taken but I think you always have to be careful about "Well, this team is stupid so they may do dumb things". I get it, and I rule it out, but I think the bad decisions most teams make are defensible decisions that just don't work out.
And with regards to "selling fans" on a move...I mean, I don't think there are a lot of Sabres fans out there labouring under the perception that whatever happens with them isn't effectively already a rebuild. Inserting Marner in Eichel's place doesn't make that any less true.
herman said:I?ve got time for Jakob Chychrun, Dylan Strome, Dylan Larkin (quite unlikely), maybe Christian Dvorak*, Oliver Bjorkstrand ($$), Travis Konecny, Alex Nylander (RFA), Jakub Vrana (RFA)
* Another personal support acquisition for Marner, eh?
bustaheims said:herman said:I?ve got time for Jakob Chychrun, Dylan Strome, Dylan Larkin (quite unlikely), maybe Christian Dvorak*, Oliver Bjorkstrand ($$), Travis Konecny, Alex Nylander (RFA), Jakub Vrana (RFA)
* Another personal support acquisition for Marner, eh?
Chychrun could be an interesting add, though his defence took a step back as his offence grew.
Strome is a bit of a buy-low candidate, but don't love the $3M cap hit if he doesn't regain some production.
Larkin is also a buy-low candidate with a big cap hit.
Dvorak hasn't shown himself to be worth his cap hit yet. Would need to include salary retention for me to have interest.
Bjorkstrand feels like a lesser Hyman who gets paid similar to what Zach will get as a UFA.
A. Nylander doesn't interest me at all. Missed the entire 20/21 season, and didn't show much before that. For super cheap, maybe.
Konecny is interesting. Vrana could also be, depending on his next contract.
Basically, you have too much time for too many players.
RedLeaf said:I can hear the backlash on this already but ?.Nylander for Eichel straight up.
Nik said:RedLeaf said:I can hear the backlash on this already but ?.Nylander for Eichel straight up.
I'm not sure there's a ton of backlash coming your way outside of Buffalo not being willing to do that.
That's a no brainer for T.O minus the money. Leafs need to add like Nik says. I would trade Marner for him and Buff may not go for it.Nik said:RedLeaf said:I can hear the backlash on this already but ?.Nylander for Eichel straight up.
I'm not sure there's a ton of backlash coming your way outside of Buffalo not being willing to do that.
Nik said:Yes, if there's one thing you need, it's the guy with a career .908 playoff SV% who has made it out of the first round once.
Johnny T can't be traded and Nylander is a keeper.Heroic Shrimp said:https://twitter.com/globekpd/status/1401903134822354946
Boston writer has opinions on how to fix the Leafs.