ZBBM
Active member
herman said:A lot of great players look pretty plain on a steady diet of Chara.
A 41-year-old Chara who looked gassed out there a lot tonight.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
herman said:A lot of great players look pretty plain on a steady diet of Chara.
azzurri63 said:herman said:Zee said:I wonder if any of the reporters give Babcock a grilling on his ice time distribution. It was evident pretty early on that Gardiner was struggling and Dermott was playing well yet Gardner ends up playing 24 minutes to 11 for Dermott.
Kapanen scored an amazing shorty and be played under 9 minutes??? Like c'mon some of this is on the coach for not managing his team in game
The kids from the Marlies were nice-to-haves; I agree they're generally the better option, but the coach has gone through the entire season leaning on his prime players to pretty good effect and you sort of have to bank on that. I'd like Babcock to be faster on the uptake, but that's just how I see it.
I thought Kapanen and Johnsson should've been up with the Leafs last year instead of Matt Martin and whoever so that they'd be ready to be relied upon this year, but there's also their confidence and developmental readiness to account for. Johnsson said he appreciated the extra time they afforded him with the Marlies, rather than calling him up to be the franchise saviour and yo-yoing him when he inevitably faltered a bit.
Herman I respect your comments on this forum but Gardiner was plain and simple horrible all night. Man if you have the game recorded or a chance to watch it again in it's entirety count the number of mistakes Gardiner cost us today plus all the ill advised bad passes and icing and running around in his own end. Minus 2 in the collapse in 2012 and even better minus 5 tonight. Enough said.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:herman said:A lot of great players look pretty plain on a steady diet of Chara.
A 41-year-old Chara who looked gassed out there a lot tonight.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:herman said:A lot of great players look pretty plain on a steady diet of Chara.
A 41-year-old Chara who looked gassed out there a lot tonight.
CarltonTheBear said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:herman said:A lot of great players look pretty plain on a steady diet of Chara.
A 41-year-old Chara who looked gassed out there a lot tonight.
Yeah, he's still 6'9" but he's a shell of his former self.
In the playoffs his job is to win and put players on the ice that give you the best chance of winning. Gardiner wasn't one of them tonight.Guru Tugginmypuddah said:Zee said:You pay the coach 6 million a year to do whatever it takes to win. He's got to assess who's playing well and who doesn't have it. It was fairly evident to everyone that Gardiner didn't have it tonight, evident to everyone but the coach. Part of the blame goes to the coachherman said:Zee said:I wonder if any of the reporters give Babcock a grilling on his ice time distribution. It was evident pretty early on that Gardiner was struggling and Dermott was playing well yet Gardner ends up playing 24 minutes to 11 for Dermott.
Kapanen scored an amazing shorty and be played under 9 minutes??? Like c'mon some of this is on the coach for not managing his team in game
The kids from the Marlies were nice-to-haves; I agree they're generally the better option, but the coach has gone through the entire season leaning on his prime players to pretty good effect and you sort of have to bank on that. I'd like Babcock to be faster on the uptake, but that's just how I see it.
I thought Kapanen and Johnsson should've been up with the Leafs last year instead of Matt Martin and whoever so that they'd be ready to be relied upon this year, but there's also their confidence and developmental readiness to account for. Johnsson said he appreciated the extra time they afforded him with the Marlies, rather than calling him up to be the franchise saviour and yo-yoing him when he inevitably faltered a bit.
Winning at all costs isn't his job though. Throwing the young guys to the wolves and destroying their confidence isn't Babcock's job. The Leafs are trying to build something long term, and bringing along your younger players is more important.
azzurri63 said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:herman said:A lot of great players look pretty plain on a steady diet of Chara.
A 41-year-old Chara who looked gassed out there a lot tonight.
Are we talking about Matthews?
Matthew is not overrated and I'm def not worried about him. Give some credit to Chara. I think Babs said that Datsyuk didn't score a goal in his 1st 4 playoff series. He's 20 years old. I really hope Babs gives him Johnsson or Kaps for a winger next year.Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:Zee said:I'm not concerned about Matthews at all.BermudaBudsFan said:Perspective is hard this soon after, but despite their young age, there are some issues here.
I think there are some concerns about Matthews. He was largely ineffective and for a player of his talent and size it is of concern.
There have to be questions about Andersen. While some games he was great, in three of the games he was not. Is he consistent enough to be the guy? That isn?t clear to me.
The defence is bad. Really bad and if it isn?t fixed there won?t be much chance of being a Cup competitor at all. Not sure what they do about that. No more high picks to find a stud D-man.
There were of course some positives, but difficult to see those in the context of a Game 7 loss. It is so disappointing because the Bruins were there to be taken tonight.
Unless it's revealed that he's been playing hurt I agree with BBF on Matthews. My concerns are that we might be overrating him just a tad. He got neutralized and the very best of the best find ways not to be.
Bender said:I get a sinking feeling that Gardiner is done as a Leaf. He's too risk/reward. But man, we are so thin on D if we're getting rid of Polak and who knows about Zaitsev. This team is lacking so badly on D.
Zee said:In the playoffs his job is to win and put players on the ice that give you the best chance of winning. Gardiner wasn't one of them tonight.Guru Tugginmypuddah said:Winning at all costs isn't his job though. Throwing the young guys to the wolves and destroying their confidence isn't Babcock's job. The Leafs are trying to build something long term, and bringing along your younger players is more important.
Look at the Boston side, Debrusk is 21 and played over 15 minutes, they weren't afraid to give a young guy who was playing well a shot. Kapanen should have gotten more ice, Dermott should have gotten more ice. You play to win, otherwise what's the point?
Zee said:In the playoffs his job is to win and put players on the ice that give you the best chance of winning. Gardiner wasn't one of them tonight.Guru Tugginmypuddah said:Zee said:You pay the coach 6 million a year to do whatever it takes to win. He's got to assess who's playing well and who doesn't have it. It was fairly evident to everyone that Gardiner didn't have it tonight, evident to everyone but the coach. Part of the blame goes to the coachherman said:Zee said:I wonder if any of the reporters give Babcock a grilling on his ice time distribution. It was evident pretty early on that Gardiner was struggling and Dermott was playing well yet Gardner ends up playing 24 minutes to 11 for Dermott.
Kapanen scored an amazing shorty and be played under 9 minutes??? Like c'mon some of this is on the coach for not managing his team in game
The kids from the Marlies were nice-to-haves; I agree they're generally the better option, but the coach has gone through the entire season leaning on his prime players to pretty good effect and you sort of have to bank on that. I'd like Babcock to be faster on the uptake, but that's just how I see it.
I thought Kapanen and Johnsson should've been up with the Leafs last year instead of Matt Martin and whoever so that they'd be ready to be relied upon this year, but there's also their confidence and developmental readiness to account for. Johnsson said he appreciated the extra time they afforded him with the Marlies, rather than calling him up to be the franchise saviour and yo-yoing him when he inevitably faltered a bit.
Winning at all costs isn't his job though. Throwing the young guys to the wolves and destroying their confidence isn't Babcock's job. The Leafs are trying to build something long term, and bringing along your younger players is more important.
Look at the Boston side, Debrusk is 21 and played over 15 minutes, they weren't afraid to give a young guy who was playing well a shot. Kapanen should have gotten more ice, Dermott should have gotten more ice. You play to win, otherwise what's the point?
Guilt Trip said:Matthew is not overrated and I'm def not worried about him. Give some credit to Chara. I think Babs said that Datsyuk didn't score a goal in his 1st 4 playoff series. He's 20 years old. I really hope Babs gives him Johnsson or Kaps for a winger next year.Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:Zee said:I'm not concerned about Matthews at all.BermudaBudsFan said:Perspective is hard this soon after, but despite their young age, there are some issues here.
I think there are some concerns about Matthews. He was largely ineffective and for a player of his talent and size it is of concern.
There have to be questions about Andersen. While some games he was great, in three of the games he was not. Is he consistent enough to be the guy? That isn?t clear to me.
The defence is bad. Really bad and if it isn?t fixed there won?t be much chance of being a Cup competitor at all. Not sure what they do about that. No more high picks to find a stud D-man.
There were of course some positives, but difficult to see those in the context of a Game 7 loss. It is so disappointing because the Bruins were there to be taken tonight.
Unless it's revealed that he's been playing hurt I agree with BBF on Matthews. My concerns are that we might be overrating him just a tad. He got neutralized and the very best of the best find ways not to be.
Agree with that. You have to play who's going. Babs should have sat Gardiner but couldn't early when Reilly got hurt. He def could have later. Gardiner's mistakes were the ultimate downfall in this game.Zee said:In the playoffs his job is to win and put players on the ice that give you the best chance of winning. Gardiner wasn't one of them tonight.Guru Tugginmypuddah said:Zee said:You pay the coach 6 million a year to do whatever it takes to win. He's got to assess who's playing well and who doesn't have it. It was fairly evident to everyone that Gardiner didn't have it tonight, evident to everyone but the coach. Part of the blame goes to the coachherman said:Zee said:I wonder if any of the reporters give Babcock a grilling on his ice time distribution. It was evident pretty early on that Gardiner was struggling and Dermott was playing well yet Gardner ends up playing 24 minutes to 11 for Dermott.
Kapanen scored an amazing shorty and be played under 9 minutes??? Like c'mon some of this is on the coach for not managing his team in game
The kids from the Marlies were nice-to-haves; I agree they're generally the better option, but the coach has gone through the entire season leaning on his prime players to pretty good effect and you sort of have to bank on that. I'd like Babcock to be faster on the uptake, but that's just how I see it.
I thought Kapanen and Johnsson should've been up with the Leafs last year instead of Matt Martin and whoever so that they'd be ready to be relied upon this year, but there's also their confidence and developmental readiness to account for. Johnsson said he appreciated the extra time they afforded him with the Marlies, rather than calling him up to be the franchise saviour and yo-yoing him when he inevitably faltered a bit.
Winning at all costs isn't his job though. Throwing the young guys to the wolves and destroying their confidence isn't Babcock's job. The Leafs are trying to build something long term, and bringing along your younger players is more important.
Look at the Boston side, Debrusk is 21 and played over 15 minutes, they weren't afraid to give a young guy who was playing well a shot. Kapanen should have gotten more ice, Dermott should have gotten more ice. You play to win, otherwise what's the point?
I agree with that. He was fine last year but Washington doesn't have a Chara. It's not like he didn't get any chances. He had 9 shots on goal the last 2 games. He can't do it on his own either. No offense but Hyman and Brown don't exactly scream offense. Kaps would be a better fit IMO. Nylander played scared out there..Matthews didn't. One good thing tho, it should keep Willies contact reasonableZanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:Guilt Trip said:Matthew is not overrated and I'm def not worried about him. Give some credit to Chara. I think Babs said that Datsyuk didn't score a goal in his 1st 4 playoff series. He's 20 years old. I really hope Babs gives him Johnsson or Kaps for a winger next year.Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:Zee said:I'm not concerned about Matthews at all.BermudaBudsFan said:Perspective is hard this soon after, but despite their young age, there are some issues here.
I think there are some concerns about Matthews. He was largely ineffective and for a player of his talent and size it is of concern.
There have to be questions about Andersen. While some games he was great, in three of the games he was not. Is he consistent enough to be the guy? That isn?t clear to me.
The defence is bad. Really bad and if it isn?t fixed there won?t be much chance of being a Cup competitor at all. Not sure what they do about that. No more high picks to find a stud D-man.
There were of course some positives, but difficult to see those in the context of a Game 7 loss. It is so disappointing because the Bruins were there to be taken tonight.
Unless it's revealed that he's been playing hurt I agree with BBF on Matthews. My concerns are that we might be overrating him just a tad. He got neutralized and the very best of the best find ways not to be.
I hope I'm wrong but he's definitely got something to prove in the playoffs next year (assuming we make them).
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:azzurri63 said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:herman said:A lot of great players look pretty plain on a steady diet of Chara.
A 41-year-old Chara who looked gassed out there a lot tonight.
Are we talking about Matthews?
Yes.